本文排版定稿已在中国知网网络首发,如需阅读全文请打开知网首页,并搜索该论文题目即可查看。

半干旱黄土丘陵区3种土壤持水量的坡面变化及尺度效应定量研究

Quantitative study on the slope variation and scale effect of three types of soil water holding capacity in semi-arid loess hilly region

  • 摘要: 为探索土壤持水量“由样地到坡面”尺度换算的精准便捷方法,在宁南黄土区选取3个“坡上部退耕还林、坡下部水平梯田”典型坡面,沿坡位梯度布设5处样地,分层测定0~200 cm深度土壤的最大、毛管、田间持水量,分析其坡面空间变化特征;采用坡面滑动平均值随离坡顶水平距离的变化量定量表征尺度效应,建立不同坡位样地值与坡面均值的经验方程。结果表明:研究区土壤持水量坡向差异较小,坡位变化与尺度效应明显;东坡3种持水量均值分别为43.56%、34.54%、29.41%,与西坡和南坡较接近,相对误差为0.17%~3.71%;随离坡顶水平距离增加,东、西、南坡土壤持水量整体呈下降趋势,最大值所处的坡位存在差异。构建的土壤持水量比值(样地与坡面)与水平坡长的经验方程(R2>0.85,P<0.0001),估算坡面均值的相对误差均小于5.09%,可在研究区域内实现土壤持水量由样地到坡面的精准便捷尺度上推。

     

    Abstract: To explore a precise and convenient method for the “from plot to slope” scale conversion of soil water holding capacity, three typical slopes with the upper part of reforested fields and the lower part of terraced fields were selected in the loess region of southern Ningxia. Along the slope position gradient, five plots were established on each slope to measure the maximum, capillary and field water holding capacities of the soil at depths of 0-200 cm, and their spatial variation characteristics on the slope were analyzed. Besides, the scale effect was quantitatively described by the change in the slope sliding average value with the horizontal distance from the slope top, and empirical equations were established between the values of plots at different positions and the slope average value. The results showed the slope-aspect differences were small in three soil water holding capacities, whereas evident differences existed among slope positions and across scales. On the east slope, the average values of soil maximum water holding capacity, capillary water holding capacity and field water holding capacity were 43.56%, 34.54% and 29.41%, respectively, which were close to those on the west and south slope. The relative errors were between 0.17% and 3.71%. As the horizontal distance from the slope top increased, the soil water holding capacity generally showed a decreasing trend, and the slope position where the maximum values occurred varied. The empirical equations were constructed between the soil water holding capacity ratio (plot v.s. slope) and the horizontal slope length (R2>0.85, P<0.0001), with the relative errors of less than 5.09% for estimating the slope average value. Therefore the precise and convenient up-scaling of soil water capacity from plots to slopes can be achieved within the study area.

     

/

返回文章
返回