Jiali Weng, Xiaogang Wu, Shiyu Lin, Yiyang Lu, Manhong Xiao. Study on Ecological Sensitivity of Rural Landscape in Meikou, Nanping City[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2020, 40(1): 153-159. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.201812005
Citation: Jiali Weng, Xiaogang Wu, Shiyu Lin, Yiyang Lu, Manhong Xiao. Study on Ecological Sensitivity of Rural Landscape in Meikou, Nanping City[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2020, 40(1): 153-159. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.201812005

Study on Ecological Sensitivity of Rural Landscape in Meikou, Nanping City

More Information
  • Received Date: December 04, 2018
  • Revised Date: May 30, 2019
  • Available Online: September 28, 2019
  • Published Date: December 31, 2019
  • Taking the Meikou Village in Songxi County of Fujian Province as the research object, the 8 indicators of land use type, topography, slope, slope direction, collapse, landslide, distance from water and traffic access are used as evaluation factors. Delphi method, analytic hierarchy process and weighted superposition method for comprehensive analysis of natural landscape ecological sensitivity. The results show that the most important indicator affecting the ecological environment of Meikou Village is the land use type, followed by the distance from the water area, next comes the landslide and collapse, the slope and the slope direction are relatively modest, the traffic access degree and the topography are weak; The closer to the water, the landscapes with the most prone to disasters and slopes have the stronger ecological sensitivity, while the landscapes with relatively flat terrain and more settlements have weaker landscape ecological sensitivity. The residential areas are low-sensitive areas, along the Songxi River and a certain distance around them are generally sensitive areas, the development and utilization areas near the foot of the hill are medium-sensitive areas, the southeast part of the village area is high-sensitive areas, and the northwest part of the village area is the highest elevation area, it showed high sensitivity.
  • 张荣天, 焦华富. 中国省际城镇化与生态环境的耦合协调与优化探讨 [J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2015, 29(7): 12−17.
    徐永清, 阮于洲. 论地理国情监测促进行业转型升级 [J]. 遥感信息, 2014, 29(4): 6−9. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3177.2014.04.002
    梁涛, 蔡春霞, 刘民, 等. 城市土地的生态适宜性评价方法: 以江西萍乡市为例 [J]. 地理研究, 2007, 26(4): 782−788, 859. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2007.04.015
    Ólafsdóttir R, Runnström M C. A GIS approach to evaluating ecological sensitivity for tourism development in fragile environments. A case study from SE Iceland. [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality & Tourism, 2009, 9(1): 22−38.
    Feizizadeh B, Jankowski P, Blaschke T. A GIS based Spatially-explicit Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Approach for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis [J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2013, 64(1): 81−95.
    罗先香, 邓伟. 松嫩平原西部土壤盐渍化动态敏感性分析与预测 [J]. 水土保持学报, 2000, 14(3): 36−40. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2000.03.008
    林涓涓, 潘文斌. 基于GIS的流域生态敏感性评价及其区划方法研究 [J]. 安全与环境工程, 2005, 12(2): 23−26, 34. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1556.2005.02.007
    魏玮, 伍世代. 欠发达山区农村居民点整理潜力评价与空间分异研究: 以福建省松溪县为例 [J]. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 2014, 9(2): 26−31. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7105.2014.02.005
    司惠超. 基于GIS的县域生态敏感性分析与评价: 以安徽省全椒县为例 [J]. 规划师, 2015, 31(S2): 263−267.
    田文波, 高馨. 基于GIS的旅游小城镇生态敏感性分析: 以二道白河镇为例 [J]. 四川建材, 2018, 44(2): 39−40. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4011.2018.02.020
    屈赛, 林爱文, 黎斌, 等. 基于生态敏感性的庐山区生态旅游用地策略 [J]. 生态科学, 2018, 37(1): 164−170.
    程磊, 朱查松, 罗震东. 基于生态敏感性评价的城市非建设用地规划探讨: 以南京市江宁区大连山-青龙山片区概念规划为例 [J]. 规划师, 2009, 25(4): 63−66, 94. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2009.04.010
    李慧. 城市公园园亭空间适宜性评价研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2018: 37−43.
    佘济云, 周丹华, 刘照程, 等. 基于GIS的万泉河流域生态敏感性分析 [J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(10): 69−73. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2011-3252
    刘澜, 唐晓岚, 熊星, 等. 基于GIS的苏南乡村自然景观的生态敏感性分析 [J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(4): 159−164.

Catalog

    Article views (840) PDF downloads (23) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return