Variation Analysis on Tree Indexes and Fruit Traits of 12 Main <i>Camellia oleifera</i> Varieties in JiangXi Province

Meng Yan; Juan Liu; Dongnan Hu; Li Cheng; Junping Liu; Aowen Xu; Zengliang Zhou; Huiyun Liu; Zhenli Wang

doi:10.11929/j.swfu.201903134

Journal of Southwest Forestry University > 2019 > 39(6): 57-63. > DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.201903134

Meng Yan, Juan Liu, Dongnan Hu, Li Cheng, Junping Liu, Aowen Xu, Zengliang Zhou, Huiyun Liu, Zhenli Wang. Variation Analysis on Tree Indexes and Fruit Traits of 12 Main Camellia oleifera Varieties in JiangXi Province[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2019, 39(6): 57-63. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.201903134

Citation:

PDF (676 KB)

Variation Analysis on Tree Indexes and Fruit Traits of 12 Main Camellia oleifera Varieties in JiangXi Province

College of Forestry, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang Jiangxi 330045, China

More Information

Received Date: March 25, 2019
Revised Date: April 19, 2019
Available Online: August 25, 2019
Published Date: October 31, 2019

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In order to discuss the variation of tree indexes and fruit traits among different Camellia oleifera varieties and evaluate the grade of the varieties comprehensively, tree indexes and fruit traits were analyzed by ANOVA, multiple comparison, cluster analysis and principal component analysis. The results showed that there was a certain degree of variation on the tree indexes and fruit traits, with an average coefficient of variation of 17.57%. The variation coefficient of yield per plant was the largest, and the fruit longitudinal diameter variation coefficient was the smallest; The repeatability of all tested traits was higher than 0.5, which means that all traits are of high repeatability, the differences are mainly affected by genetic diversity; There were significant differences in traits among the tested varieties. The fruit economic characters of Gan84-8 and Changlin4 were better than those of others and the yield per plant of Changlin3 was higher than that of others; The tree body of ChangLin40 is relatively tall. According to the results of cluster analysis, 12 varieties were divided into 4 categories, and the best ones were Changlin4, Changlin53, Gan83-4. Gan84-8, Gan84-3 and Ganwu1 were respectively better. Ganxing48 ranked the worst. The tree indexes and fruit traits of the investigated C.oleifera varieties showed a large variation range and were of high level of genetic diversity.
- Camellia oleifera,
- fruit traits,
- variation analysis,
- repeatability

FullText(HTML)

References (24)

References

张日清, 丁植磊, 张勖, 等. 油茶育种研究进展 [J]. 经济林研究, 2006, 25(4): 1−8. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8981.2006.04.017

陈永忠, 罗健, 王瑞, 等. 中国油茶产业发展的现状与前景 [J]. 粮食科技与经济, 2013, 38(1): 10−12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1458.2013.01.035

高伟, 幸伟年, 龚春, 等. 茶油的营养价值和开发前景 [J]. 江西林业科技, 2013, 30(4): 52−55. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2505.2013.04.018

庄瑞林. 我国油茶良种选育工作的历史回顾与展望 [J]. 林业科技开发, 2010, 24(6): 1−5. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2010.06.001

国家林业局. 国家林业局关于进一步加强油茶良种使用和管理工作的通知 [EB/OL]. (2016-09-05)[2019-01-08]. http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/4818/content-902839.html.

李斌, 顾万春, 卢宝明. 白皮松天然群体种实性状表型多样性研究 [J]. 生物多样性, 2002, 10(2): 181−188. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-0094.2002.02.008

Mizianty M, Frey L, Bieniek W, et al. Variability and structure of natural populations of Hordelymus europaeus (L.) Jess. ex Harz and Leymus arenarius (L.) Hochst. as revealed by morphology and DNA markers [J]. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 2007, 269(1/2): 15−28.

王开良, 姚小华, 任华东, 等. 油茶无性系丰产性状和稳定性分析 [J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(1): 174−178.

侯学勇, 王超, 罗建勋, 等. 四川盆地不同油茶栽培品种性状的综合评价 [J]. 四川林业科技, 2018, 39(5): 13−16.

许洋. 不同栽培区域长林无性系油茶籽品质的研究 [D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2010.

江源. 油茶长林系列良种在不同分布生境下适应性的研究 [D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2016.

王楚天, 胡冬南, 游璐, 等. 赣无系列19个油茶品系生长性状变异分析 [J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2016, 38(5): 905−912.

陈俊杰. 小果油茶优良无性系表型特征和经济性状研究 [D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2015.

中华人民共和国卫生部. 食品中脂肪的测定: GB/T 5009.6—2003 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2004.

戴金辉. 单因素方差分析中异方差的检验与修正 [J]. 统计与决策, 2017, 30(8): 23−26.

续九如. 重复力及其在树木育种中的应用 [J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1988, 10(4): 97−102.

张莹, 刘硕, 王宏. 基于SPSS的主成分分析法在松花江哈尔滨段的水质评价 [J]. 哈尔滨师范大学自然科学学报, 2015, 31(3): 132−135. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5617.2015.03.037

王靓钰, 夏其乐, 陈剑兵, 等. 基于主成分分析的不同品种柑橘制汁适应性研究 [J]. 果树学报, 2019, 36(4): 504−51.

戚嘉敏, 张鹏, 奚如春, 等. 高州油茶果实性状的遗传变异特征 [J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(4): 108−113.

费昭雪, 彭少兵. 陕南不同产地核桃综合性状评价 [J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2018, 38(5): 90−96.

刘娇, 范志远, 贠新华, 等. 云南主栽核桃品种坚果品质比较及综合评价 [J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2018, 38(5): 97−102.

杜洋文, 邓先珍, 徐春永, 等. 主成分分析法在油茶无性系综合评价中的应用 [J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2012, 34(6): 1193−1198. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2286.2012.06.019

邓必平, 程玉娜, 吴延旭, 等. 主成分分析法在油茶优良无性系果实经济性状选种上的应用研究 [J]. 中国林副特产, 2017, 38(2): 1−3.

王楚天, 游璐, 钟琳珊, 等. 江西29个油茶品种始果早期表型变异分析 [J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2017, 37(1): 73−81.

[1]	Dou Jiaming, Zhou Lujing, Liu Dianting, Zhang Houjiang. Modal Analysis of Vibration Signals of Full-size Oriented Strand Board Based on ICEEMDAN−Laplace[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2024, 44(6): 168-176. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202310006
[2]	Yujian Guo, Peixuan Wang, Kaibing Zhou, Hong Wang, Chengkun Yang, Jing Chen. Dynamic Analysis of Fruit Organs Growth and Oil Content of Camellia vietnamensis[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2020, 40(4): 175-179. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.201906026
[3]	Guanghui Cai, Huan Xiong, Wenwen Jia, Pengfei Hu, Lang Deng, Lianchun Wang, Jun Zhou, Huimin Liu. The Variation Analysis of the Fruit′s Economic and Yield Character of the Sapindus delavayi[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2018, 38(4): 37-45. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2018.04.006
[4]	Ling Liu, Rui Wei, Hongying Yu, Qianxue Wang, Fangyuan Shen. Fruit Characters Variation of Ribes mandshuricum[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2017, 37(6): 23-29. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2017.06.004
[5]	Chutian Wang, Lu You, Linshan Zhong, Lunan Lian, Dongnan Hu. Analysis of Phenotypic Variation on 29 Varieties of Young Camellia oleifera in Jiangxi Province[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2017, 37(1): 73-81. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2017.01.013
[6]	Zou Zhiying, Zhang Guofang，Feng Yu, Li Zuorong, Xu Minming, . The DRIS Nutrient Diagnosis Analysis of N, P, K in Cinnamomum camphora var.iinaloolifera Under Different Fertilization Proportions[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2015, 35(5): 32-36. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2015.05.006
[7]	HUANG Yong1, YAO Xiao-hua2, LI Zhi-zhen1, XIE Yi-qing1, WANG Kai-liang2, REN Hua-dong2. Study on Variation Characteristics of Camellia meiocarpa Leaf Phenotype Traits[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2013, 33(1): 1-9. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2013.01.001
[8]	FENG Jun, SHI Bin, ZENG De-xian, ZHU Ren-gang, DENG Gui-xiang, FAN Lin-yuan. Analysis on Fruit Traits of Superior Individuals of Jatropha curcas in Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2008, 28(2): 25-29. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2008.02.007
[9]	LI Hong, CHENG Hong-tao, WU Xue-jing, WANG Hong-juan. Analysis on Correlation among Leaf and Fruit Characteristics of Acer truncatum[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2008, 28(2): 10-12,20. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2008.02.003
[10]	Wang Hailin, Yan Lusheng, Wu Lin, Huang Zhiyong, Yang Jianguo. A STUDY ON THE CONTROL INDEX OF PHENACASPIS KENTIAE KUWANA[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 1992, 12(1): 63-69. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.1992.01.010

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(13)

1.	张路红，资超成，吴伟，赵坤，李培旺，蒋丽娟，李昌珠，肖志红，陈韵竹. 10个广西主栽油茶果实经济性状对比研究. 中国粮油学报. 2025(01): 97-103 .
2.	季琳琳，陈素传，姚小华，张文胜，韩文妍，殷刘彪. 19个油茶品种果实主要经济性状和油脂品质的差异分析. 中国农学通报. 2024(01): 20-27 .
3.	周源洁，李佶芸，孙志东，李培，陈艳琼，王浩. 凉山州8株野生油茶经济性状及脂肪酸组成分析. 农业研究与应用. 2024(Z1): 224-230 .
4.	王帆，黄平，黄佩萍，唐淑贞，梁卫华，熊诵明，纪珂. 宜春市油茶种质资源收集与评价. 现代园艺. 2023(24): 17-19+22 .
5.	杨超臣，姚小华，冯纪福，陈有师，张亚蕾，杨雨晨. 海南地区油茶新品系果实性状与脂肪酸组分分析. 江西农业大学学报. 2022(03): 614-625 .
6.	马丽丽，张绿水，兰龙焱，张强，文洁，吴若鸿，袁生贵，胡明文，郭晓敏，张文元. 不同品种油茶叶片磷组分及果实经济性状对磷素的响应. 江西农业大学学报. 2022(04): 919-928 .
7.	张恒，申春晖，陈锐帆，袁汕，傅志强，奚如春. 基于3种数学方法的粤北油茶果实性状综合评价. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2022(11): 71-79+208 .
8.	杨雨晨，陈娟娟，姚小华，舒常庆，黄梅，杨兵兵，刘林秀，杨超臣. 50个普通油茶果实性状综合评价. 中国粮油学报. 2022(12): 175-182 .
9.	徐德兵，陈福，张林涛，郭晓春，宋顺超，贾代顺，袁其琼，刘倬志. 云南高原山地油茶籽油脂肪酸组成及品质分析. 西部林业科学. 2021(01): 112-117 .
10.	陈云峰，韦林宏，李康富，马锦林. 来宾地区引种小果油茶成效分析. 广西林业科学. 2021(03): 309-313 .
11.	叶润，蔡静，李尽哲，孙伟，申家朋. 油茶叶多糖的闪式提取工艺优化及其抗氧化活性. 生物质化学工程. 2021(05): 42-46 .
12.	陆思羽，胡冬南，郭晓敏，刘小平，易世平，涂淑萍，喻苏琴. 4个油茶品种的果实生长动态及经济性状比较. 经济林研究. 2020(02): 46-52 .
13.	晏巢，姚小华，殷恒福，王开良，尹润富，滕建华. 油茶果实生长发育动态和木质素积累规律. 江西农业大学学报. 2020(04): 788-801 .

Other cited types(6)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (885) PDF downloads (26) Cited by(19)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Variation Analysis on Tree Indexes and Fruit Traits of 12 Main Camellia oleifera Varieties in JiangXi Province