Haolin Qin, Biru Li, Shufei Weng, Xiaofan Wang. Physiological Response and Comprehensive Evaluated on 3 Species of Landscape Tree Seedlings Subjected to Soil Drought and Waterlogging[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2020, 40(4): 68-73. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.201906036
Citation: Haolin Qin, Biru Li, Shufei Weng, Xiaofan Wang. Physiological Response and Comprehensive Evaluated on 3 Species of Landscape Tree Seedlings Subjected to Soil Drought and Waterlogging[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2020, 40(4): 68-73. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.201906036

Physiological Response and Comprehensive Evaluated on 3 Species of Landscape Tree Seedlings Subjected to Soil Drought and Waterlogging

More Information
  • Received Date: June 16, 2019
  • Revised Date: December 10, 2019
  • Available Online: January 17, 2020
  • Published Date: June 30, 2020
  • This paper disposed of Cinnamomum burmannii, Elaeocarpus sylvestris and Ilex rotunda seedlings in drought, waterlogging and drought-waterlogging soil conditions, 8 physiological indexes of each species were determined. Based on the fuzzy membership function, water stress resistance and physiological response of the 3 species of landscape tree seedlings was explored. The results showed that in waterlogging treatment, the malondialdehyde increment of I. rotunda decreased and its superoxide dismutase actiity reduced slightly, with mild waterlogging injury. In drought treatment, malondialdehyde of E. sylvestris and I. rotunda increased, superoxide dismutase activity and water use efficiency decreased significantly, these indicated E. sylvestris and I. rotunda had more serious damage by drought, whereas the malondialdehyde and superoxide dismutase activity of C. burmannii decreased slightly, showed that C. burmannii had the slightest injury degree. In drought-waterlogging treatment, the soluble protein content of 3 seedlings increased while superoxide dismutase activity, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate decreased significantly. These 3 seedlings could enhance osmotic adjustment ability by increasing soluble protein content so as to cope with water stress. In continuous drought and flood-drought treatment, seedlings reduced transpiration by closing the stomata to maintained higher water use efficiency.
  • 翁殊斐, 朱锦心, 苏志尧, 等. 岭南地区滨水绿地植物景观质量评价 [J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(1): 20−27. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170103
    崔英, 王占林, 张得芳, 等. 土壤含水量和光照对祁连圆柏光合生理指标的影响 [J]. 西部林业科学, 2019, 48(5): 95−100.
    韩博, 李志勇, 郭浩, 等. 干旱胁迫下5种幼苗光合特性的研究 [J]. 林业科学研究, 2014, 27(1): 92−98.
    Wu Y B, Hong W J, Chen Y H. Leaf physiological and anatomical characteristics of two indicator species in the limestone region of southern China under drought stress [J]. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 2018, 50(4): 1335−1342.
    Herrera A. Responses to flooding of plant water relations and leaf gas exchange in tropical tolerant trees of a black-water wetland [J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2013(4): 106.
    Vidal D B, Andrade I L M M, Dalmolin Â, et al. Photosynthesis and growth of copaiba seedlings subjected to soil flooding [J]. Floresta E Ambiente, 2019, 26(1): 1−8.
    梁芳, 黄寿镕, 於艳萍, 等. 红花玉蕊对淡水全淹胁迫的生长及生理响应 [J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2019, 39(3): 18−25.
    秦永梅, 杨慧, 李杰, 等. 干旱对樱桃幼苗根际微生物及生理指标的影响 [J]. 西部林业科学, 2019, 48(4): 44−49.
    王晓帆, 冯嘉仪, 翁殊斐, 等. 热带园林4种木质藤本植物叶性状与环境适应能力研究 [J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2019, 39(3): 166−171.
    陶汉成, 马长乐, 徐胜. 臭氧和干旱对梓树叶片色素含量和荧光生理的影响 [J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2018, 38(6): 83−88.
    关春景, 焦孟月, 张彦妮. 8个矮牵牛品种抗旱性综合评价分析 [J]. 西北林学院学报, 2018, 33(2): 62−69. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2018.02.10
    李洁, 列志旸, 薛立, 等. 干旱胁迫对3种园林绿化树种幼苗生理指标的影响 [J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2016, 36(2): 56−61.
    韩文娇, 白林利, 李昌晓, 等. 前期水淹对牛鞭草后期干旱胁迫光合生理响应的影响 [J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(18): 5712−5724.
    Al-Dhubiab B. Pharmaceutical applications and phytochemical profile of Cinnamomum burmannii [J]. Pharmacognosy Reviews, 2012, 6(12): 125−131. DOI: 10.4103/0973-7847.99946
    Kim M, Kim Y, Choi Y, et al. Elaeocarpusin inhibits mast cell-mediated allergic inflammation [J]. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2018(9): 591. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00591
    钱燕萍, 田如男. 冬青属种质资源及其园林应用研究进展 [J]. 世界林业研究, 2016, 29(3): 40−45.
    潘昕, 邱权, 李吉跃, 等. 干旱胁迫下华南地区3种苗木渗透调节物质的动态变化 [J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2012, 33(4): 519−523. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2012.04.018
    Yeung E, van Veen H, Vashisht D, et al. A stress recovery signaling network for enhanced flooding tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115(26): 6085−6094. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1803841115
    Li S W, Pezeshki S, Goodwin S. Effects of soil moisture regimes on photosynthesis and growth in cattail (Typha latifolia) [J]. Acta Oecologica, 2004, 25(1/2): 17−22.
    高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
    杨鹏, 胥晓. 淹水胁迫对青杨雌雄幼苗生理特性和生长的影响 [J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(1): 81−87.
    Larré C, Fernando J A, Marini P, et al. Growth and chlorophyll a fluorescence in Erythrina crista-galli L. plants under flooding conditions [J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2013, 35(5): 1463−1471. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-012-1187-4
    李淑琴, 张璐, 张纪林, 等. 3种冬青属树种的耐涝性和耐旱性评价 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2007, 26(2): 204−208. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4890.2007.02.011
    Zhao H, Zhao Y, Zhang C, et al. Growth, leaf gas exchange, and chlorophyll fluorescence responses of two cultivars of Salix integra thunb. to waterlogging stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science & Technology, 2014, 16(1): 137−149.
    Pierce S C, Pezeshki S R, Moore M T. Ditch plant response to variable flooding: a case study of Leersia oryzoides (rice cutgrass) [J]. Journal of Soil & Water Conservation, 2007, 62(4): 216−225.
    衣英华, 樊大勇, 谢宗强, 等. 模拟淹水对池杉和栓皮栎光合生理生态过程的影响 [J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(12): 6025−6033. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.12.030
    范苏鲁, 苑兆和, 冯立娟, 等. 干旱胁迫对大丽花生理生化指标的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(3): 651−657.
    Pflug E E, Buchmann N, Siegwolf R T W, et al. Resilient leaf physiological response of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) to summer drought and drought release [J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018(9): 1−11.
    Monneveux P, Rekika D, Acevedo E, et al. Effect of drought on leaf gas exchange, carbon isotope discrimination, transpiration efficiency and productivity in field grown durum wheat genotypes [J]. Plant Science, 2006, 170(4): 867−872. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.12.008
    Xu Z Z, Zhou G S, Shimizu H. Plant responses to drought and rewatering [J]. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 2010, 5(6): 649−654.

Catalog

    Article views (1011) PDF downloads (15) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return