Jiang Dezhi, Wang Qizhu, Xu Yongjie. Effects of Storage Physiology on Fresh Walnut without Green Husk After 1−MCP Composite Vacuum Packaging Treatment[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2023, 43(6): 179-184. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202212003
Citation: Jiang Dezhi, Wang Qizhu, Xu Yongjie. Effects of Storage Physiology on Fresh Walnut without Green Husk After 1−MCP Composite Vacuum Packaging Treatment[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2023, 43(6): 179-184. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202212003

Effects of Storage Physiology on Fresh Walnut without Green Husk After 1−MCP Composite Vacuum Packaging Treatment

More Information
  • Received Date: December 01, 2022
  • Revised Date: April 02, 2023
  • Accepted Date: April 05, 2023
  • Available Online: April 16, 2023
  • Published Date: November 24, 2023
  • To extend the storage period, the peeled fresh walnuts(Juglans regia ‘Qingxiang’) were treated by three storage methods such as vacuum plus desiccant, vacuum, non-vacuum after 1−MCP fumigation, physiological indexes such as nucleolar acid value, nucleolar peroxide value, total phenols and flavone of walnut pellicle were measured and studied. The result showed that with the duration of storage time, the moisture content of fresh walnut nucleolus decreased, the acid value and peroxide value of nucleolus increased, the content of flavonoids and total phenols in endotesta decreased, and the physiological indexes were significantly correlated(P<0.05). The moisture content of nucleolus can be used as an important indicator parameter for the change of physiological indexes of fresh walnut during storage. The fresh walnuts wihout green husk could be stored 15 days at low temperature(1 ± 0.5) ℃ after 3 μL/L 1−MCP fumigation and vacuum packaging treatment with drying agent, which could slow down the increase of nucleolar acid value and peroxide value while maintaining nucleolar moisture content during storage. The 1−MCP combined vacuum packaging treatment could delay the decrease of the nucleolus quality, it had great significance for the storage and preservation of peeled fresh walnut.
  • 郗荣庭, 张毅萍. 中国果树志—核桃卷[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1996.
    马艳萍, 马惠玲, 刘兴华, 等. 鲜食核桃和干核桃贮藏生理及营养品质变化比较 [J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2011, 37(3): 235−238.
    韩强, 郜海燕, 陈杭君, 等. ClO2处理和包装方法对鲜核桃仁贮藏品质的影响 [J]. 中国食品学报, 2017, 17(5): 130−137.
    黄凯, 袁德保, 韩忠. 鲜食核桃贮藏中生理生化变化的研究 [J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(23): 9858−9860, 9960.
    李孙玲, 杨建华, 陈诗, 等. 不同贮藏温度对鲜食核桃呼吸速率和油脂品质的影响 [J]. 北方园艺, 2015(9): 112−114.
    郭园园, 鲁晓翔, 李江阔, 等. 1−MCP处理复合薄膜包装对青皮鲜核桃采后品质的影响 [J]. 食品科学, 2014, 35(10): 252−257. DOI: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201410047
    张丽萍, 朱旭, 马惠玲. 不同包装处理对鲜食核桃的保鲜效应 [J]. 山东农业科学, 2014, 46(10): 117−119.
    冯文煜, 蒋柳庆, 马惠玲, 等. 不同厚度PE膜包装对核桃果实采后生理与鲜贮的效应 [J]. 食品科学, 2013, 34(18): 295−300.
    杨曦, 张润光, 韩军岐, 等. 不同贮藏方式对核桃鲜果采后生理及贮藏品质的影响 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(10): 2029−2038.
    袁德保. 鲜食核桃冷藏技术及采后生理研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2007.
    陈柏, 颉敏华, 吴小华, 等. 5种保鲜剂对低温贮藏去青皮核桃感官品质的影响 [J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2018(6): 40−44.
    胡波, 李国元, 谢志兵, 等. 不同浓度的1−MCP处理对鄂北冬枣低温贮藏品质的影响 [J]. 食品研究与开发, 2014, 35(20): 1−3.
    孙希生, 王文辉, 李志强, 等. 1−MCP对砀山酥梨保鲜效果的影响 [J]. 保鲜与加工, 2001, 1(6): 14−17.
    侯佳迪, 朱丽娟, 王军萍, 等. 1−MCP处理期不同成熟度‘霞晖8号’桃果实贮藏中品质和生理生化特性的影响 [J]. 食品工业科技, 2021, 42(17): 326−334.
    张建业, 姚向峰, 杜庆志, 等. 1−MCP发气剂对苹果保鲜效果的研究 [J]. 落叶果树, 2021, 53(2): 26−30.
    付亮, 刘诗扬, 徐方旭. 不同浓度1−MCP对草莓果实货架期品质的影响 [J]. 辽宁大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 42(3): 280−284.
    刘荣, 刘清国, 雷朝云, 等. 1−MCP对保持采后芒果常温贮藏品质及生理的影响 [J]. 食品研究与开发, 2018, 39(14): 197−201. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2018.14.036
    费斐, 薛风照. 1−MCP对板栗采后生理的影响 [J]. 食品研究与开发, 2016, 37(10): 195−198.
    中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 食品安全国家标准 食品中水分的测定: GB 5009.3—2016[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
    中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 食品安全国家标准 食品中过氧化值的测定: GB 5009.227—2016[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
    中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 食品安全国家标准 食品中酸价的测定: GB 5009.229—2016[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
    张春江, 吕飞杰, 台建祥, 等. 槟榔果及其制品中总酚和单宁含量的测定 [J]. 食品研究与开发, 2008, 29(6): 119−121.
    钟冬莲, 韩素芳, 丁明. 分光光度法测定西红柿中总黄酮含量的方法比较 [J]. 食品科学, 2009, 30(22): 272−274.
    徐华. 气调贮藏对生核桃仁及其加工品品质的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2011.
    Vanhanen L P, Savage G P. The use of peroxide value as a measure of quality for walnut flour stored at five different temperatures using three different types of packaging [J]. Food Chemistry, 2006, 99(1): 64−69. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.07.020
    Nalder T D, Marshall S, Preffer F M, et a1. Characterisation of lipase fatty acid selectivity using novel omega-3 pNP-acyl esters [J]. Journal of Functional Foods, 2014, 6: 259−269. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2013.10.015
    周晔. 核桃内种皮多酚分析与抗氧化活性[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2013.
    蒲成伟, 阚欢, 刘云. 不同贮藏条件下核桃及其油脂品质的变化分析 [J]. 中国油脂, 2018, 43(2): 46−50.
    郝利平, 杨剑婷. 贮藏因素对核桃脂肪酶活性与油脂酸价的影响 [J]. 农业工程学报, 2005, 21(5): 170−172.
    Pignitter M, Stolze K, Gartner S, et al. Cold fluorescent light as major inducer of lipid oxidation in soybean oil stored at household conditions for eight weeks [J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2014, 62(10): 2297−2305. DOI: 10.1021/jf405736j
    Pristouri G, Badeka A, Kontominas M G. Effect of packaging material headspace, oxygen and light transmission, temperature and storage time on quality characteristics of extra virgin olive oil [J]. Food Control, 2010, 21(4): 412−418. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.06.019
    Psomiadou E, Tsimidou M. Stability of virgin olive oil. 1. Autoxidation studies [J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2002, 50(4): 716−721. DOI: 10.1021/jf0108462
    Maté J I, Saltveit M E, Krochta J M. Peanut and walnut rancidity: effects of oxygen concentration and relative humidity [J]. Journal of Food Science, 1996, 61(2): 465−469. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1996.tb14218.x
    Salcedo C L, Lopez D M B A, Nazareno M A. Walnuts and almonds as model systems of foods constituted by oxidisable, pro-oxidant and antioxidant factors [J]. Food Research International, 2010, 43(4): 1187−1197. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.02.016

Catalog

    Article views (449) PDF downloads (7) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return