Liu Huanhuan, Li Chenyang, Li Mengli, Meng Fengqun. Study on Insect Community Composition and Diversity Between Pinus massoniana Plantation and the Adjacent Natural Forest in Guangxi[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2024, 44(2): 144-154. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202212017
Citation: Liu Huanhuan, Li Chenyang, Li Mengli, Meng Fengqun. Study on Insect Community Composition and Diversity Between Pinus massoniana Plantation and the Adjacent Natural Forest in Guangxi[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2024, 44(2): 144-154. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202212017
shu

Study on Insect Community Composition and Diversity Between Pinus massoniana Plantation and the Adjacent Natural Forest in Guangxi

  • 1.

    College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning Guangxi 530004, China

  • 2.

    Guangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation, Nanning Guangxi 530004, China

More Information
  • Received Date: December 08, 2022
  • Revised Date: April 17, 2023
  • Accepted Date: April 27, 2023
  • Available Online: May 07, 2023
  • Published Date: March 19, 2024
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • To estimate the significance of Pinus massoniana plantation in biodiversity conservation, the Malaise trap method was used to investigate the insect community composition and diversity in P. massoniana plantation and the adjacent natural forest in Shiwandashan Nature Reserve, Damingshan Nature Reserve and Huaping Nature Reserve, Guangxi. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance(PERMANOVA), nonmetric multidimensional scaling(NMDS), similarity percentage(SIMPER) and one-way ANOVA were conducted to explore the differences of insect community composition and diversity between P. massoniana plantation and the adjacent natural forest. The results showed that a total of 10305 insects were collected from 3 study sites, belonging to 10 orders and 102 families, and Diptera, Hemiptera, Lepidoptera and Hymenoptera were the dominant groups. PERMANOVA and NMDS analysis showed that there were significant differences in insect community composition among 3 study sites, and there were also significant differences in insect community composition between P. massoniana plantation and the adjacent natural forest in each study site. SIMPER analysis further indicated that Cecidomyiidae, Sclaridae, Lauxaniidae, Tipulidae, Mycetophilidae, Limoniidae, Dolichopodidae, Calliphoridae, Phoridae, Chironomidae, Asilidae, Ichneumonidae, Eupelmidae, Braconidae, Aphididae, Cicadellidae, Derbidae, Delphacidae, Fulgoridae, Cicadidae, Scolytidae, Chrysomelidae, Coccinellidae, Crambidae, Gracilariidae, Oecophoridae, Gelechiidae and Immidae were the major families that differed between P. massoniana plantation and the adjacent natural forest, which is probably related to microenvironment in forest or plant species community composition. There was no significant difference in species richness index, Simpson index, Shannon-Wiener index and Pielou index at the family level between P. massoniana plantation and the adjacent natural forest. The results suggest that P. massoniana plantation is not the "desert" of biodiversity and plays an important role in biodiversity conservation, but cannot replace the role of natural forest in maintaining regional biodiversity.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (57)
  • 周政贤. 中国马尾松[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2001: 1−15.
    国家林业和草原局. 中国林业产业监测报告: 2018[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2019: 9−29.
    Lyu Q, Liu J L, Liu J J, et al. Response of plant diversity and soil physicochemical properties to different gap sizes in a Pinus massoniana plantation [J]. PeerJ, 2021, 9: e12222. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12222
    Farooq T H, Li Z W, Yan W D, et al. Variations in litterfall dynamics, C: N: P stoichiometry and associated nutrient return in pure and mixed stands of camphor tree and Masson pine forests [J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022, 10: 903039. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.903039
    靳爱仙. 马尾松人工林健康评价及生态恢复模式研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2012.
    Brockerhoff E G, Jactel H, Parrotta J A, et al. Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2008, 17(5): 925−951. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-008-9380-x
    孟庆繁. 人工林生物多样性研究的现状及展望 [J]. 世界林业研究, 1998, 11(2): 26−31.
    孟庆繁. 人工林在生物多样性保护中的作用 [J]. 世界林业研究, 2006, 19(5): 1−6. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4241.2006.05.001
    Calviño-Cancela M, Rubido-Bará M, van Etten E J B. Do eucalypt plantations provide habitat for native forest biodiversity? [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2012, 270: 153−162. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.019
    Liu J J, Coomes D A, Gibson L, et al. Forest fragmentation in China and its effect on biodiversity [J]. Biological Reviews, 2019, 94(5): 1636−1657. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12519
    Johns J. Native Orchids of New Zealand[M]. 1st ed. Wellington: A. H. & A. W. Reed Pty Ltd. , 1983: 124.
    Berndt L A, Brockerhoff E G, Jactel H. Relevance of exotic pine plantations as a surrogate habitat for ground beetles (Carabidae) where native forest is rare [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2008, 17(5): 1171−1185. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-008-9379-3
    Allen R, Platt K, Wiser S. Biodiversity in New Zealand plantations [J]. New Zealand Forestry, 1995, 39(4): 26−29.
    Ecroyd C E, Brockerhoff E G. Floristic changes over 30 years in a Canterbury Plains kanuka forest remnant, and comparison with adjacent vegetation types [J]. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 2005, 29(2): 279−290.
    李裕元, 郑纪勇, 邵明安. 子午岭天然林与人工林群落特征比较研究 [J]. 西北植物学报, 2005, 25(12): 2447−2456. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2005.12.015
    Deng C, Zhang S G, Lu Y C, et al. Thinning effects on forest evolution in Masson pine (Pinus massoniana Lamb. ) conversion from pure plantations into mixed forests [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2020, 477: 118503. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118503
    刘兴平, 刘向辉, 王国红, 等. 多样化松林中昆虫群落多样性特征 [J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(11): 184−190.
    赵辉, 周运超, 任启飞. 不同林龄马尾松人工林土壤微生物群落结构和功能多样性演变 [J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(1): 227−238.
    党香宁, 肖玖金, 韦晴雯, 等. 林窗改造对马尾松人工林土壤动物群落的影响 [J]. 森林与环境学报, 2021, 41(1): 66−75.
    高海山. 广西花坪自然保护区植物物种多样性研究[D]. 桂林: 广西师范大学, 2007.
    李吉宁. 广西十万大山国家级自然保护区高保护价值森林判定和管理研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2017.
    周晓果, 温远光, 朱宏光, 等. 大明山常绿阔叶林冠层垂直结构与林下植物更新 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(2): 367−374.
    高军, 杨建英, 史常青, 等. 密云水库上游油松人工水源涵养林林下植物多样性与土壤理化特性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2305−2313.
    Anderson M, Gorley R N. Permanova + for primer: guide to software and statistical methods [M]. Plymouth, UK: Primer-E, 2008: 214.
    Abbas S, Nichol J E, Zhang J, et al. The accumulation of species and recovery of species composition along a 70 year succession in a tropical secondary forest [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 106: 105524. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105524
    Clarke K R, Gorley R N, Somerfield P J, et al. Change in marine communities: An approach to statistical analysis and interpretation [M]. Plymouth, UK: Primer-E, 2014: 256.
    杨立军, 张丹丹. 井冈山自然保护区蛾类多样性及人为干扰的影响 [J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2014, 36(5): 679−686.
    刘哲强, 马玲, 焦玥, 等. 小兴安岭森林恢复期典型人工林与原始林昆虫群落结构动态 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(2): 555−562.
    周镇. 云南澜沧拉祜族自治县昆虫生物多样性调查与评估[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2019.
    张翔, 卢志兴, 王庆, 等. 区域景观中生境特异性对昆虫多样性的影响: 以西双版纳为例 [J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2021(5): 771−780.
    Brockerhoff E, Berndt L, Jactel H. Role of exotic pine forests in the conservation of the critically endangered New Zealand ground beetle Holcaspis brevicula (Coleoptera: Carabidae) [J]. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 2005, 29(1): 37−43.
    Zhang K, Lin S L, Ji Y Q, et al. Plant diversity accurately predicts insect diversity in two tropical landscapes [J]. Molecular Ecology, 2016, 25(17): 4407−4419. DOI: 10.1111/mec.13770
    Meng J H, Lu Y C, Zeng J. Transformation of a degraded Pinus massoniana plantation into a mixed-species irregular forest: impacts on stand structure and growth in Southern China [J]. Forests, 2014, 5(12): 3199−3221. DOI: 10.3390/f5123199
    Leal C R O, Fagundes M, de Siqueira Neves F. Change in herbivore insect communities from adjacent habitats in a transitional region [J]. Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 2015, 9(3): 311−320. DOI: 10.1007/s11829-015-9362-3
    Summerville K S, Crist T O, Kahn J K, et al. Community structure of arboreal caterpillars within and among four tree species of the eastern deciduous forest [J]. Ecological Entomology, 2003, 28(6): 747−757. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2003.00561.x
    Campos R I, Vasconcelos H L, Ribeiro S P, et al. Relationship between tree size and insect assemblages associated with Anadenanthera macrocarpa [J]. Ecography, 2006, 29(3): 442−450. DOI: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04520.x
    许洪军, 于立忠, 黄选瑞, 等. 辽东山区次生林与人工林大型地表节肢动物多样性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(3): 727−735.
    Pöyry J, Luoto M, Paukkunen J, et al. Different responses of plants and herbivore insects to a gradient of vegetation height: an indicator of the vertebrate grazing intensity and successional age [J]. Oikos, 2006, 115(3): 401−412. DOI: 10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.15126.x
    Magura T, Tóthmérész B, Bordán Z. Effects of nature management practice on carabid assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a non-native plantation [J]. Biological Conservation, 2000, 93(1): 95−102. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00073-7
    Humphrey J W, Hawes C, Peace A J, et al. Relationships between insect diversity and habitat characteristics in plantation forests [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 1999, 113(1): 11−21. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00413-7
    孟庆繁, 胡隐月, 赵秀海, 等. 毗邻天然林的人工林生物多样性研究[C]//中国科学院生物多样性委员会. 生物多样性与人类未来: 第二届全国生物多样性保护与持续利用研讨会论文集. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1998: 383−387.
    梁召俊. 川西高原森林昆虫种类多样性垂直分布研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017.
    李巧, 陈又清, 周兴银, 等. 云南元谋干热河谷捕食性昆虫多样性 [J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(10): 82−87. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2008.10.014
    Frey S J K, Hadley A S, Johnson S L, et al. Spatial models reveal the microclimatic buffering capacity of old-growth forests [J]. Science Advances, 2016, 2(4): e1501392. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1501392
    中国科学院中国动物志编辑委员会. 中国经济昆虫志−第五十一册−膜翅目 姬蜂科[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1996: 38.
    王章训, 张云会, 王新谱. 宁夏主要天然林区蛾类多样性及区系 [J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2015, 37(2): 234−241.
    马玲, 问荣荣, 焦玥, 等. 小兴安岭不同林型的昆虫多样性 [J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(2): 82−90.
    Slabejová D, Bacigál T, Hegedüšová K, et al. Comparison of the understory vegetation of native forests and adjacent Robinia pseudoacacia plantations in the Carpathian-Pannonian region [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2019, 439: 28−40. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.039
    中国科学院中国动物志编辑委员会. 中国经济昆虫志−第二十九册−鞘翅目 小蠹科[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1984: 5.
    李宏. 山西野生草本植物蚜虫种类资源调查与研究[D]. 太谷: 山西农业大学, 2005.
    杨霄, 陈晓晓, 袁周伟, 等. 轻中度石漠化地区不同土地利用类型叶蝉群落结构及动态 [J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(16): 6790−6800.
    辛蓓, 党英侨, 王小艺, 等. 昆虫分布南界的形成原因及影响因素 [J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(24): 9379−9386.
    Bragança M A L, Zanuncio J C, Picanco M, et al. Effects of environmental heterogeneity on Lepidoptera and Hymenoptera populations in Eucalyptus plantations in Brazil [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 1998, 103(2/3): 287−292.
    中国科学院中国动物志编辑委员会. 中国经济昆虫志−第三十六册−同翅目 蜡蝉总科[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1985: 3−4.
    邹言, 刘佳文, 李立坤, 等. 北京市延庆区不同生境昆虫多样性特征调查分析 [J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2020, 57(5): 1161−1172.
    付作霖, 杨静, 李丹春, 等. 甘南亚高山典型森林生境地表步甲的群落结构及多样性分析 [J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(5): 47−55. DOI: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2021.05.007
    林志文, 张文祥, 张贵良, 等. 区域尺度下不同生境甲虫多样性比较: 以云南红河州为例 [J]. 西部林业科学, 2022, 51(2): 106−112.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]Zhao Yuanxiang, Wu Mingchang, Zhang Jun, Wang Haoyun, Liang Daqu, Wu Feng. Application of Pilodyn method in Predicting the Basic Density of Standing Trees of Pinus massoniana Large-diameter Wood[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2025, 45(1): 213-219. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202311014
    [2]Zhu Xinyu, Zhang Jianben, Liang Xuesong, Li Mengli, Jiang Chaoyou, Meng Fengqun. Comparative Study on Ground-dwelling Insect Communities between Eucalyptus Plantations and Adjacent Zonal Natural Forests in Yachang, Guangxi[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202403019
    [3]Li Dengxing, Yang Zhangqi, Yan Peidong, Ling Tianwang, Qin Fujian, Li Peng. Effects of Stand Density on Canopy Structure and Understory Herbs of Pinus massoniana Plantation Community[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2024, 44(2): 60-68. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202303070
    [4]Yin Wang, Ruiling Yao. Analysis on Genetic Diversity of Growth Characters in Seedling Stage of Pinus massoniana Clones[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2018, 38(6): 58-62. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2018.06.007
    [5]Quan Li, Wenyu Qi, Kai Ren, Jinguo Lin. Biodegradation of Pinus massoniana by Brown-rot Fungi Based on X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2018, 38(3): 188-193. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2018.03.027
    [6]Fengjiao Zhou, Rui Deng, Lingshuai Peng, Xiaoli Wei. The Influence of Fertilizatation on Spikes and Cuttings of Pinus massoniana[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2017, 37(6): 65-69. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2017.06.011
    [7]WEI Peixing, HUANG Siwei, ZHOU Dingguo. Study on Property Change of Pinus massoniana Veneer Before and After Degreasing Treatment[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2012, 32(4): 86-89. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2012.04.018
    [8]TAN Jianhui1, HUANG Yongli2, FENG Yuanheng1, SHU Wenbo1, LU Cuixiang1. Age Variation of Wood Tracheid Morphology of Pinus massoniana Families[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2012, 32(3): 80-83. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2012.03.017
    [9]WU Zhe-dong, CHEN Wei, NI Fen-liang, DENG Yu-ying, ZHU Chao-hua, CHEN Yong-fu. Preliminary Studies on Death Cause of Pinus massoniana in Hushan Scenic Spot[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2000, 20(1): 45-47. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2000.01.011
    [10]Chen Fengshu, Pu Xiaolan. ANATOMICAL STUDY ON MORPHOLOGICAL FREEZING INJURY IN PINUS YUNNANENSIS[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 1987, 7(1): 33-37. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.1987.01.004

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (276) PDF downloads (10) Cited by()
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    Copyright © 滇ICP备10002112号-2

    Address：#129 Mailbox, NO.300 Bailongsi, Kunming Yunnan, China Postcode：650233

    Tel：0871-63863029/63862787 E-mail：swfcbjb@vip.163.com

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return