Liu Kezhen, He Cheng. Research Progress on Characteristics of Fire Resistant Tree Species from Microscopic Perspective[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2024, 44(3): 212-220. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202301017
Citation: Liu Kezhen, He Cheng. Research Progress on Characteristics of Fire Resistant Tree Species from Microscopic Perspective[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2024, 44(3): 212-220. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202301017

Research Progress on Characteristics of Fire Resistant Tree Species from Microscopic Perspective

More Information
  • Received Date: January 08, 2023
  • Revised Date: March 07, 2023
  • Available Online: June 24, 2023
  • Published Date: May 19, 2024
  • The physical and chemical properties of wood were determined by the microstructural characteristics of tree species, which was of great significance to study the ecological adaptability of vegetation, control the structure of biological community, identification of wood species, wood processing and utilization, especially for the mechanism of forest fire prevention. In this paper, fire-resistant tree species were choosen as the research object, non-fire-resistant tree species as a reference, the research progress of fire-resistant forest belt and the application of wood anatomical micro techniques, the structural characteristics of fire-resistant wood, the microscopic characteristics of leaves and roots were reviewed, and the future direction of research was prospected. The aim is to provide scientific basis for our country's forest fire prevention engineering construction to respond to the ecological civilization fire prevention.
  • Kelly L T, Brotons L. Using fire to promote biodiversity [J]. Science, 2017, 355(6331): 1264−1265. DOI: 10.1126/science.aam7672
    Fuentes-Ramirez A, Veldman J W, Holzapfel C, et al. Spreaders, igniters, and burning shrubs: plant flammability explains novel fire dynamics in grass-invaded deserts [J]. Ecological Applications:a Publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2016, 26(7): 2311−2322. DOI: 10.1002/eap.1371
    李冬林, 金雅琴, 崔梦凡, 等. 遮光对连香树幼苗光合特性及其叶片解剖结构的影响 [J]. 西北植物学报, 2019, 39(6): 1053−1063.
    Curran T, Perry G, Wyse S, et al. Managing fire and biodiversity in the wildland-urban interface: a role for green firebreaks [J]. Fire, 2017, 1(1): 3. DOI: 10.3390/fire1010003
    Behm A L, Long A J, Monroe M C, et al. Fire in the wildland-urban interface: preparing a firewise plant list for WUI residents [J]. EDIS, 1969, 2004(15): 1453.
    Rocca G D, Danti R, Raddi P, et al. Implementation of the cypress system as a green firewall [J]. Project CypFire, 2014, 3: 275−280.
    Ryu S R, Choi H T, Lim J H, et al. Post-fire restoration plan for sustainable forest management in south Korea [J]. Forests, 2017, 8(6): 188. DOI: 10.3390/f8060188
    王海晖, 陶骏骏, 盛昌栋. 森林防火隔离带技术的变革与优势 [J]. 世界林业研究, 2015, 28(6): 46−52.
    舒立福, 田晓瑞, 李惠凯. 防火林带研究进展 [J]. 林业科学, 1999, 35(4): 80. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.1999.04.013
    Murray B, Martin L, Brown C, et al. Selecting low-flammability plants as green firebreaks within sustainable urban garden design [J]. Fire, 2018, 1(1): 15. DOI: 10.3390/fire1010015
    舒立福, 刘晓东. 森林防火学概论 [M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2016.
    孙永明, 张文恒, 姚丽敏, 等. 山西省生物防火树种选择研究 [J]. 山西林业科技, 2017, 46(2): 1−6.
    李艳芹, 胡海清, 冯仲科. 帽儿山地区几种乔木树种燃烧性研究 [J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2010, 32(4): 22−25.
    胡海清, 鞠琳. 小兴安岭8个阔叶树种的燃烧性能 [J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(5): 90−95.
    Alessio G A, Peñuelas J, Llusià J, et al. Influence of water and terpenes on flammability in some dominant Mediterranean species [J]. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2008, 17(2): 274. DOI: 10.1071/WF07038
    邹璐, 陶远胜, 甘继权, 等. 井冈山自然保护区16种树叶的抗火性排序 [J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2012, 34(5): 976−982.
    Parsons A L, Balch J K, de Andrade R B, et al. The role of leaf traits in determining litter flammability of south-eastern Amazon tree species [J]. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2015, 24(8): 1143. DOI: 10.1071/WF14182
    Ganteaume A, Jappiot M, Lampin C, et al. Flammability of some ornamental species in wildland-urban interfaces in southeastern France: laboratory assessment at particle level [J]. Environmental Management, 2013, 52(2): 467−480. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0067-z
    Dimitrakopoulos A P. A statistical classification of Mediterranean species based on their flammability components [J]. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2001, 10(2): 113−118. DOI: 10.1071/WF01004
    郑焕能, 卓丽环, 胡海清. 生物防火[M]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学出版社, 1999: 35−53.
    孙永明, 魏立, 刘随存, 等. 生物防火林带有效宽度和结构研究 [J]. 西北林学院学报, 2013, 28(5): 139−142.
    肖化顺, 刘发林, 向顺常, 等. 马尾松群落防火林带有效宽度模型研究 [J]. 西北林学院学报, 2008, 23(1): 134−137.
    葛会方, 邱树林, 娄富超, 等. 杉木热解过程的微观形貌演变及成分分析 [J]. 中国公共安全(学术版), 2018(4): 56−59.
    刘玲, 赵敏, 张世星, 等. 不同受热温度下炭化红松表面微观形貌和成分分析 [J]. 火灾科学, 2008, 17(3): 150−154. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5309.2008.03.004
    徐德良, 王思群, 孙军, 等. 木材有效导热系数研究进展 [J]. 世界林业研究, 2014, 27(2): 39−44.
    Vay O, Obersriebnig M, Müller U, et al. Studying thermal conductivity of wood at cell wall level by scanning thermal microscopy (SThM) [J]. Holzforschung, 2013, 67(2): 155−159. DOI: 10.1515/hf-2012-0052
    林琳, 庞瑶, 刘毅, 等. 超声波辅助纳米Ag/TiO2浸渍木材的化学改性与微观构造表征 [J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(12): 102−111.
    鲍咏泽, 周永东. 过热蒸汽干燥对50 mm 厚柳杉锯材质量及微观构造的影响 [J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2016, 44(4): 66−68, 73.
    杨建飞, 宁莉萍, 杨了, 等. 黑壳楠木材构造特征及挥发性有机物成分 [J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2018, 35(5): 927−934.
    廖晓玲, 宁莉萍, 汤雯, 等. 黄心楠与桢楠木材构造特征及物理性能比较 [J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(5): 101−108, 124.
    He C, Liu K Z, Shu L F, et al. The diagnostic methods for resurgences of smoldering fire in the forests by infrared thermal imaging [J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2018, 1(38): 326−332.
    Cui X L, Alam M A, Perry G L, et al. Green firebreaks as a management tool for wildfires: lessons from China [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 233: 329−336.
    刘柯珍, 舒立福, 杨光, 等. 利用热红外成像仪识别夜间林火 [J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 48(1): 69−74.
    吕叶香, 余鸿发, 邓格求, 等. 不同产地刺猬紫檀木射线组织比较解剖研究 [J]. 林业与环境科学, 2018, 34(6): 98−102.
    黄广华, 陈瑞英, 陈居静. 巴里黄檀木材解剖构造、颜色及接触角研究 [J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(2): 234−239.
    赵敏, 陈瑞英. 2种条纹乌木木材的构造特征 [J]. 森林与环境学报, 2016, 36(3): 289−294.
    刘红清, 宋刚, 李敏华, 等. 无损检测方法在红木制品识别中的应用 [J]. 西北林学院学报, 2014, 29(5): 203−206.
    李敏华, 刘红清, 李桂兰, 等. 红木家具与工艺品木材无损检测方法研究 [J]. 家具与室内装饰, 2013(9): 96−98. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8260.2013.09.019
    彭海源, 乔玉娟, 崔永志. 河姆渡遗址七千年古木鉴定研究 [J]. 东北林业大学学报, 1986(S3): 1−3, 165−166.
    徐永吉, 吴达期, 张耀丽. 圩墩遗址古木研究 [J]. 南京林业大学学报, 1994(1): 51−56.
    陈家宝, 齐文玉, 张勇, 等. 福州文儒坊西段古城墙和护城河遗址遗存古木解剖 [J]. 安徽农学通报, 2018, 24(12): 72−73, 76.
    崔新婕, 邱坚, 高景然. 利用荧光偏光技术对古木进行腐朽等级判定及加固程度的辨析 [J]. 文物保护与考古科学, 2016, 28(4): 48−53.
    黄正峰, 奚三彩, 孙国平, 等. 古木硅化处理对其物化性能的影响 [J]. 材料科学与工程学报, 2016, 34(4): 526−529, 534.
    焦立超, 殷亚方, 孙清鹏, 等. 基于DNA的木材识别新技术发展与应用 [J]. 木材工业, 2012, 26(1): 27−30, 38.
    张一萍. 木材DNA识别新技术研究获突破 [J]. 木材工业, 2013, 27(1): 58.
    Lowe A J, Cross H B. The applicat ion of dna methods to timber tracking and origin verificat ion [J]. IAWA Journal, 2011, 32(2): 251−262. DOI: 10.1163/22941932-90000055
    Murray M G, Thompson W F. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA [J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 1980, 8(19): 4321−4326. DOI: 10.1093/nar/8.19.4321
    Ouinsavi C, Sokpon N, Khasa D P. Genetic diversity and population structure of a threatened African tree species, Milicia excelsa, Using nuclear microsatellites DNA markers [J]. International Journal of Forestry Research, 2009, 2009: 1−8.
    陈爽, 金小飞, 杨庆. 秦白杨、西北杨木材材性及纤维形态研究 [J]. 西北林学院学报, 2021, 36(3): 232−236, 272. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2021.03.34
    孙瑾, 王晓静, 高振忠, 等. 无瓣海桑木材解剖特性及应用价值评价 [J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2014, 35(2): 86−89.
    Mott K A, Gibson A C, O'Leary J W. The adaptive significance of amphistomatic leaves [J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 1982, 5(6): 455−460.
    刘欣欣, 张明如, 邹伶俐, 等. 浙江省15个树种苗期叶片解剖结构特征比较分析 [J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2013, 30(4): 484−489.
    Schreiber S G, Hacke U G, Hamann A. Variation of xylem vessel diameters across a climate gradient: insight from a reciprocal transplant experiment with a widespread boreal tree [J]. Functional Ecology, 2015, 29(11): 1392−1401. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12455
    史晓霞, 张国芳, 孟林, 等. 马蔺叶片解剖结构特征与其抗旱性关系研究 [J]. 植物研究, 2008, 28(5): 584−588.
    丁菲, 杨帆, 李德龙, 等. 构树解剖结构特征与抗旱性研究 [J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(36): 20949−20952. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2010.36.162
    Liu Q, Li Z H, Wu J Y. Research progress of leaf anatomical structure of plants under drought stress [J]. Agriculture Science and Technology, 2016, 17(1): 4−7.
    段洪浪, 吴建平, 刘文飞, 等. 干旱胁迫下树木的碳水过程以及干旱死亡机理 [J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(11): 113−120.
    Zhao M Y, Hong S J, Wang C M. Anatomy of different ages of streblus asper leaves and their drought resistance [J]. Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 18(1): 87−92.
    任媛媛, 翟晓巧, 刘艳萍. 6个构树无性系叶片解剖结构与抗旱性的关系 [J]. 陕西农业科学, 2015, 61(12): 17−21.
    王树森, 孟凡旭, 赵波, 等. 大青山阳坡五种灌木叶片解剖结构及其抗旱性研究 [J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(1): 38−44. DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2018.0702
    范志霞, 陈越悦, 付荷玲. 成都地区10种园林灌木叶片结构与抗旱性关系研究 [J]. 植物科学学报, 2019, 37(1): 70−78. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2019.10070
    赵祥, 董宽虎, 张垚, 等. 不同居群达乌里胡枝子叶片解剖结构研究 [J]. 草地学报, 2009, 17(4): 445−451.
    白重炎, 高尚风, 张颖, 等. 12个核桃品种叶片解剖结构及其抗旱性研究 [J]. 西北农业学报, 2010, 19(7): 125−128. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1389.2010.07.027
    刘彬, 麻文俊, 王军辉, 等. 基于叶片解剖结构的砂生槐群体抗旱性评价 [J]. 植物研究, 2017, 37(3): 325−333. DOI: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2017.03.002
    潘昕, 邱权, 李吉跃, 等. 基于叶片解剖结构对青藏高原25种灌木的抗旱性评价 [J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2015, 36(2): 61−68.
    杨小玉, 王晓江, 德永军. 山桃等3个树种叶片解剖结构的耐旱性特征研究 [J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2008, 34(2): 40−42. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4066.2008.02.011
    陈旭. 山东省滨海盐碱地主要造林树种根叶解剖性状与土壤理化性质的相关性[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2019.
    纪倩倩, 李德志, 刘微, 等. 常绿阔叶林8种乔灌木叶片氮含量及其分配与光合能力的关系 [J]. 西北植物学报, 2014, 34(9): 1849−1859.
    山宝琴, 贺学礼. 毛乌素沙地12种蒿属植物叶的解剖特征 [J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 35(6): 211−217. DOI: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2007.06.042
    Li H M, Xu Z G, Tang C M. Effect of light-emitting diodes on growth and morphogenesis of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plantlets in vitro [J]. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 2010, 103(2): 155−163. DOI: 10.1007/s11240-010-9763-z
    胡举伟, 代欣, 宋涛, 等. 不同光质对桑树幼苗生长和光合特性的影响 [J]. 植物研究, 2019, 39(4): 481−489. DOI: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2019.04.001
    段宝利, 吕艳伟, 尹春英, 等. 高光和低光下木本植物形态和生理可塑性响应 [J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2005, 11(2): 238−245. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-687X.2005.02.027
    Nicotra A B, Cosgrove M J, Cowling A, et al. Leaf shape linked to photosynthetic rates and temperature optima in South African Pelargonium species [J]. Oecologia, 2008, 154(4): 625−635. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-007-0865-1
    Coble A P, Fogel M L, Parker G G. Canopy gradients in leaf functional traits for species that differ in growth strategies and shade tolerance [J]. Tree Physiology, 2017, 37(10): 1415−1425. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpx048
    王坤, 韦晓娟, 刘凯, 等. 越南多毛金花茶的光合特性和叶解剖结构对光照环境的适应 [J]. 林业科学研究, 2019, 32(4): 105−113.
    宋杰, 李树发, 李世峰, 等. 遮阴对高山杜鹃叶片解剖和光合特性的影响 [J]. 广西植物, 2019, 39(6): 802−811. DOI: 10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201806031
    李冬林, 王火, 江浩, 等. 遮光对香果树幼苗光合特性及叶片解剖结构的影响 [J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(24): 9089−9100.
    Berg G, Smalla K. Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere [J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2009, 68(1): 1−13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00654.x
    熊淑萍, 张娟娟, 杨阳, 等. 不同冬小麦品种在3种质地土壤中氮代谢特征及利用效率分析 [J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(7): 601−610.
    段媛媛, 宋丽娟, 牛素旗, 等. 不同林龄刺槐叶功能性状差异及其与土壤养分的关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(1): 28−36. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201701.036
    刘旻霞, 马建祖. 阴阳坡植物功能性状与环境因子的变化特征 [J]. 水土保持研究, 2013, 20(1): 102−106.
    闫小莉, 王德炉. 不同类型土壤栽培对苦丁茶树叶片生长和光合特性的影响 [J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(19): 7208−7217.
    陈旭, 刘洪凯, 赵春周, 等. 山东滨海盐碱地11个造林树种叶解剖特征对土壤条件的响应 [J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(8): 697−708. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2019.0131
    束际林. 茶树叶片解剖结构鉴定的原理与技术 [J]. 中国茶叶, 1995, 17(1): 2−4.
    Deinlein U, Stephan A B, Horie T, et al. Plant salt-tolerance mechanisms [J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2014, 19(6): 371−379. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.02.001
    张敏, 王贺新, 徐国辉, 等. 朝鲜越桔的解剖结构及其环境适应性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(9): 2581−2588.
    Carlquist S J. Ecological strategies of xylem evolution[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.
    吴立群, 蔡志欢, 张桂莲, 等. 低温对不同耐冷性水稻品种秧苗生理特性及根尖解剖结构的影响 [J]. 中国农业气象, 2018, 39(12): 805−813. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2018.12.005
    Šmilauerová M, Šmilauer P. Morphological responses of plant roots to heterogeneity of soil resources [J]. New Phytologist, 2002, 154(3): 703−715. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00416.x
    Taylor B N, Strand A E, Cooper E R, et al. Root length, biomass, tissue chemistry and mycorrhizal colonization following 14 years of CO2 enrichment and 6 years of N fertilization in a warm temperate forest [J]. Tree Physiology, 2014, 34(9): 955−965. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpu058
    陈海波, 卫星, 王婧, 等. 水曲柳苗木根系形态和解剖结构对不同氮浓度的反应 [J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(2): 61−66.
    谷加存, 王东男, 夏秀雪, 等. 功能划分方法在树木细根生物量研究中的应用: 进展与评述 [J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(12): 1344−1351. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0167
    洪梓明, 邢亚娟, 闫国永, 等. 长白山白桦山杨次生林细根形态特征和解剖结构对氮沉降的响应 [J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(2): 608−620.
    Senock R S, Leuschner C. Axial water flux dynamics in small diameter roots of a fast growing tropical tree [J]. Plant and Soil, 1999, 208(1): 57−71. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004494432610
    García-Llamas P, Suárez-Seoane S, Taboada A, et al. Environmental drivers of fire severity in extreme fire events that affect Mediterranean pine forest ecosystems [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2019, 433: 24−32. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.051
    Yin C M, Xing M F, Yebra M, et al. Relationships between burn severity and environmental drivers in the temperate coniferous forest of Northern China [J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(24): 5127. DOI: 10.3390/rs13245127
  • Related Articles

    [1]Cao Xiulong, Gan Changtao, Chen Songyang, Zhu Peiqi, Qiu Jian. Sudy on the Anatomical Structural Characteristics and DNA Barcode Identification of Zenia insignis[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2023, 43(6): 156-164. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202210060
    [2]Zong Jianwei, Huang Peilu, Yang Yuhua, Huang Xiaodi. Effects of Sub-low Temperature and Drought Stress on Growth and Leaf Anatomic Structure of Lily[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2022, 42(5): 30-38. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202107046
    [3]Shi Peng, Wang Yong, Zhang Dapeng, Li Dongxia. Anatomical Structure Observation of Inflorescence and Flower in Elaeis guineensis[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2022, 42(2): 168-173. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202011090
    [4]Yanyan Chen, Xuan Huang, Xiaoxia Huang, Xiaomao Cheng. An Eco-anatomical Study on Abies fabri Leaves at Gradient Elevation in Gongga Mountain[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2020, 40(6): 160-165. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.201910062
    [5]Huajie Shen, Jian Qiu, Yushan Yang, Xian Wang, Yunlong Wang. Analysis of Anatomical Character and Physical-mechanical Performance of 6 Wood Species[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2020, 40(2): 149-154. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.201812016
    [6]Xiaohong Sun, Chunjiao Yang, Dacai Zhang. Comparison of Leaf Anatomical Structure of 3 Species of Kobresia in the Dongda Mountains, Tibet[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2019, 39(5): 58-65. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.201812021
    [7]Mengji Qiao, Baixu Chen, Yunlin Fu. DNA Extraction and DNA Barcoding Identification of 5 Wood Species of Phoebe spp. and Machilus spp.[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2019, 39(3): 141-148. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.201808003
    [8]Yunlei Xu, Wencai Pu, Zhixiang Yu, Yongqiong Yang, Huancheng Ma. Analysis of Leaf Anatomical Structure Differences Among Different Living Plants in the Same Community in the Dry-Hot Valley of Jinshajiang[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2018, 38(6): 74-82. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2018.06.010
    [9]La Hu, Dongshan Wu, Huilan Xu, Zhangqi Yang. Wood Anatomical Characteristics and Basic Properties of Cyclobalanopsis glauca Natural Forest[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2018, 38(2): 206-210. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2018.02.034
    [10]SHANG Xulan, LI Qiongqiong, DENG Bo, FANG Shengzuo. Effects of Light Intensity and Fertilization on Leaf Traits and Anatomical Structure of Cyclocarya paliurus[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2014, 34(6): 9-15. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2014.06.002

Catalog

    Article views (283) PDF downloads (15) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return