Gao Ming, Shi Aoao, Cai Xiaojun, Wu Ke, Yang Mai, Sun Shixian. Study on Removal Effects of Plant Configurations on Prometryn in Water[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2024, 44(2): 94-100. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202303054
Citation: Gao Ming, Shi Aoao, Cai Xiaojun, Wu Ke, Yang Mai, Sun Shixian. Study on Removal Effects of Plant Configurations on Prometryn in Water[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2024, 44(2): 94-100. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202303054

Study on Removal Effects of Plant Configurations on Prometryn in Water

More Information
  • Received Date: March 21, 2023
  • Revised Date: May 11, 2023
  • Accepted Date: May 16, 2023
  • Available Online: May 23, 2023
  • Published Date: March 19, 2024
  • A greenhouse hydroponic simulation experiment was conducted to study the prometryn content in water at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 30 days under different concentrations of prometryn pollution in Vetiveria zizanioides, Acorus calamus, and their 2∶1 configuration. The findings revealed that in water polluted by different concentrations of prometryn, the removal rate of prometryn in the plant planting group was 58.60%–91.69% on the 30th day, while in the control group (without planting plants), the removal rate of prometryn was 45.86%–57.48% on the 30th day. The plant planting group was significantly higher than the control group. When the initial concentration of prometryn was <4 mg·L−1, the removal efficiency of V. zizanioides(V) for prometryn pollution in water was the highest, reaching 88.4% on the 30th day. When the initial concentration of prometryn was ≥ 4 mg· L−1, the 2∶1 combination of V. zizanioides and A. calamus(2V-1A) had the highest removal efficiency of prometryn pollution in water, reaching 91.69% on the 30th day. This study provided references for phytoremediation of water bodies polluted by prometryn at different concentrations.
  • Heri W, Carroll B, Parshley T, et al. Production, development, and registration of triazine herbicides[M]//The Triazine Herbicides. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2008: 31−43.
    European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2076/2002 [EB/OL]. (2002−11−23) [2021−07−21]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02002R2076-20140715.
    张树林, 邢克智, 张树伟. 养殖水体水华发生及控制的研究 [J]. 水利渔业, 2006, 26(2): 67−69. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1278.2006.02.032
    张骞月, 吴伟. 扑草净在养殖水体中的生态毒理效应及其微生物降解的研究进展 [J]. 生物灾害科学, 2014, 37(1): 64−69. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3704.2014.01.012
    桂英爱, 葛祥武, 孙程鹏, 等. 扑草净在环境和生物体内的降解代谢、毒性及安全性评价研究进展 [J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2019, 34(6): 846−852. DOI: 10.16535/j.cnki.dlhyxb.2019-009
    Rhind S M , Kyle C E , Ruffle H ,et al. Short- and long-term temporal changes in soil concentrations of selected endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) following single or multiple applications of sewage sludge to pastures [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2013, 181: 262−270. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.06.011
    中华人民共和国农业农村部. 中华人民共和国农业农村部公告1435 号[EB/OL]. (2010−07−30) [2021−07−21]. http://www.foodmate.net/law/shipin/164493.html.
    Papadakis E N, Vryzas Z, Kotopoulou A, et al. A pesticide monitoring survey in rivers and lakes of northern Greece and its human and ecotoxicological risk assessment [J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2015, 116: 1−9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.02.033
    Liu C M, Wang Y D, Zhang L, et al. An integrated strategy for rapid on-site screening and determination of prometryn residues in herbs [J]. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2020, 412(3): 621−633. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-019-02224-z
    郑磊, 杨文龙, 董亮, 等. 扑草净水环境质量基准及风险评估 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(8): 3825−3831. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2021.08.040
    Zhang X N, Wang J, Li Y J, et al. Environmental relevant herbicide prometryn induces developmental toxicity in the early life stages of marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma) and its potential mechanism [J]. Aquatic Toxicology, 2022(243): 106079.
    徐英江, 刘慧慧, 任传博, 等. 莱州湾海域表层海水中三嗪类除草剂的分布特征 [J]. 渔业科学进展, 2014, 35(3): 34−39. DOI: 10.11758/yykxjz.20140305
    刘丽娟, 姜向阳, 刘慧慧, 等. 扑草净胁迫对四角蛤蜊解毒相关基因表达的影响 [J]. 生态毒理学报, 2022, 17(6): 333−344.
    卢天慧, 程云辉, 许宙, 等. 多相光催化剂降解水溶液中有机农药的研究进展 [J]. 农药, 2020, 59(11): 781−788,796. DOI: 10.16820/j.cnki.1006-0413.2020.11.001
    侯胜楠, 张晟, 樊雨鑫, 等. 甲氧咪草烟在水中的光化学降解 [J]. 农药, 2022, 61(8): 598−602,610.
    张伟, 张忠明, 王进军, 等. 有机农药污染的植物修复研究进展 [J]. 农药, 2007, 46(4): 7. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0413.2007.04.001
    张希丽, 于政达, 王森, 等. 利用人工湿地去除农业径流中农药的研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(3): 1025−1034. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201903.033
    司友斌, 包军杰, 曹德菊, 等. 香根草对富营养化水体净化效果研究 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(2): 277−279. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2003.02.027
    Panjas, Sarkar D, Li K F, et al. Uptake and transformation of ciprofloxacin by vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides) [J]. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 2019, 142: 200−210.
    Nisa W, Rashid A. Potential of vetiver (Vetiveria zizanioides l. ) grass in removing selected pahs from diesel contaminated soi [J]. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 2015, 47(1): 291−296.
    石傲傲, 郑毅, 张坤, 等. 香根草对扑草净胁迫的响应和去除效果 [J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 50(2): 170−177. DOI: 10.13323/j.cnki.j.fafu(nat.sci.).2021.02.004
    胡秋香, 赵永军, 任丽君, 等. 潜流型菖蒲人工湿地不同C/N对污染物的去除效率 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2010, 29(3): 473−478. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2010.0072
    王春景, 杨海军, 刘国经, 等. 菰和菖蒲对富营养化水体净化效率的比较 [J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2007, 16(1): 5. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2007.01.009
    徐礼生, 周守标, 吴龙华, 等. 菖蒲幼苗对Cd胁迫的响应及其Cd富集能力分析 [J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2008, 17(2): 61−65. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2008.02.011
    张坤, 孙仕仙, 石傲傲, 等. 不同湿地植物配置对扑草净的吸收和去除效果研究 [J]. 核农学报, 2022, 36(9): 1887−1895. DOI: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2022.09.1887
    刘维屏. 农药环境化学[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2006.
    Wei J, Furrer G, Kaufmann S, et al. Influence of clay minerals on the hydrolysis of carbamate pesticides [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2001, 35(11): 2226−2232.
    欧晓明, 任竞, 雷满香. 新农药硫肟醚在池塘水中的水解动力学及降解机理研究 [J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2006, 25(2): 477−481. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1672-2043.2006.02.043
    Budny J. Book review: encyclopedia of toxicology, third edition [J]. International Journal of Toxicology, 2015, 34: 366−367.
    Gavrilescu M. Fate of pesticides in the environment and its bioremediation [J]. Engineering in Life Sciences, 2005, 5(6): 497−526. DOI: 10.1002/elsc.200520098
    Pilon−Smits E. Phytoremediation [J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2005, 56: 15−39.
    White J C. Inheritance of p, p'−DDE phytoextraction ability in hybridized Cucurbita pepo cultivars [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(13): 5165−5169.
    Trapp S. Plant uptake and transport models for neutral and ionic chemicals [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2004, 11(1): 33−39. DOI: 10.1065/espr2003.08.169
    Aga B, Fpa C, St A. Model−based analysis of the uptake of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) from soil into plants [J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 244: 125534.
    Paraiba L C. Pesticide bioconcentration modelling for fruit trees [J]. Chemosphere, 2007, 66(8): 1468−1475. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.09.017
    Bouldin J, Farris J, Moore M, et al. Hydroponic uptake of atrazine and lambda-cyhalothrin in Juncus effusus and Ludwigia peploides [J]. Chemosphere, 2006, 65(6): 1049−1057. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.031
    Xia H, Ma X. Phytoremediation of ethion by water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) from water [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2006, 97(8): 1050−1054. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.04.039
    吴雨涵, 余俊, 王锐涵. 不同配置人工湿地植物群落对生活污水净化效果 [J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(6): 364−371. DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2019.06.049
    周军英, 林玉锁, 徐亦钢, 等. 邻单胞菌DLL−1对土壤中甲基对硫磷的降解 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2002, 22(3): 4. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6923.2002.03.010
    闫春秀, 赵长山, 刘亚光. 微生物降解长残效除草剂的研究进展 [J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2005, 36(5): 650−654. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9369.2005.05.024
    Chaudhry Q, Blom−Zandstra M, Gupta S K, et al. Utilising the synergy between plants and rhizosphere microorganisms to enhance breakdown of organic pollutants in the environment (15 pp) [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2005, 12(1): 34−48. DOI: 10.1065/espr2004.08.213
    Álvarez A, Yaez M L, Benimeli C S, et al. Maize plants (Zea mays) root exudates enhance lindane removal by native Streptomyces strains[J]. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 2012, 66(1): 14-18.

Catalog

    Article views (348) PDF downloads (15) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return