Zhang J M, Zhang J L, Teng C K, et al. Estimation of Carbon Density Dynamics for Pinus densata Based on Time-Series Remote Sensing DataJ. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2027, 47(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202512037
Citation: Zhang J M, Zhang J L, Teng C K, et al. Estimation of Carbon Density Dynamics for Pinus densata Based on Time-Series Remote Sensing DataJ. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2027, 47(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202512037

Estimation of Carbon Density Dynamics for Pinus densata Based on Time-Series Remote Sensing Data

  • This study focused on Pinus densata in Shangri-La City and systematically depicted the spatiotemporal dynamic characteristics of carbon density in high-altitude coniferous forests based on long time-series remote sensing data by adopting a dynamic indicator of total above- and root system carbon density, multi-time scale analysis and multi-model comparison. We compared the Random Forest (RF) and Gradient Boosting Regression Tree (GBRT) models to analyze the differences in their estimation accuracy for 5- and 10-year carbon density changes and their rates, thus identifying the optimal estimation indicators. A total of 573 remote sensing variables and environmental factors were analyzed to identify the dominant drivers of carbon density dynamics. Dynamic spatial distribution maps were further produced to reveal temporal and spatial patterns of regional carbon density.Results showed that the RF model performed best for the 5-year carbon density change rate, with R2=0.88 and RMSE=3.24 tC·hm-2. Feature importance analysis of the four change indicators showed that texture factors contributed relatively highly, and the modeling variable R3T4SK had the highest feature importance (49.12%). Incorporating temperature improved the RF model’s estimation of the 5-year carbon density change rate (R2=0.91, RMSE=1.96 tC·hm-2). From 1987 to 2017, Pinus densata forests achieved a cumulative net carbon storage increment of 12.01 × 104 tC, with root carbon storage contributing 1.71 × 104 tC (14.24% of the total net increment).
  • loading

Catalog

    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return