曹积微, 袁哲, 强明礼. 微波和汽蒸加热软化棕榈藤材抗弯性能及材色的比较研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2016, 36(4): 158-162. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2016.04.026
引用本文: 曹积微, 袁哲, 强明礼. 微波和汽蒸加热软化棕榈藤材抗弯性能及材色的比较研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2016, 36(4): 158-162. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2016.04.026
Cao Jiwei1, Yuan Zhe2, Qiang Mingli1. Comparison on Bending Properties and Colors of Rattan Canes with Microwave and Steaming Softening Technology[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2016, 36(4): 158-162. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2016.04.026
Citation: Cao Jiwei1, Yuan Zhe2, Qiang Mingli1. Comparison on Bending Properties and Colors of Rattan Canes with Microwave and Steaming Softening Technology[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2016, 36(4): 158-162. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2016.04.026

微波和汽蒸加热软化棕榈藤材抗弯性能及材色的比较研究

Comparison on Bending Properties and Colors of Rattan Canes with Microwave and Steaming Softening Technology

  • 摘要: 采用微波和汽蒸加热的方式对云南省藤、版纳省藤、高地钩叶藤等3种棕榈藤材的进行软化处理,探讨不同软化方式对藤材弹性模量的影响以及软化后藤材的材色变异。结果表明:3种藤材在微波、汽蒸2种加热软化方式处理后均可达到较好的软化效果,其中以微波加热软化效率较高,软化效果较好;加热介质温度越高,加热时间相对较短,如温度较低,则需延长加热时间,才能达到软化目的;软化后的藤材色度学参数均发生不同程度变化,明度ΔL*、饱和度ΔC*和色调角ΔAg*均有所降低,总体色差ΔE*为16~27,但2种软化处理方式对材色的影响未见明显差异。

     

    Abstract: The effect of different softening methods on modulus of elasticity (MOE) and chromatic parameters of three species rattan canes, including Calamus yunnanensis, Calamus nambaruensis var. xishuangbannaensis, and Plectocomia himalayana was studied with microwave and steaming heating methods. The results showed that the softening results of both two methods for three species rattan were good, the softening efficiency and softening results of microwave softening were better. The higher the heating medium temperature was, the shorter the heating time was, the heating time would be increased with lower temperature medium in order to achieve better softening results. Chromatic parameters of samples treated by microwave and steaming heating were changed, lightness ΔL*, saturation ΔC* and hue angle ΔAg* values decreased, total chromatic aberration ΔE* was increased and its range was about 16 to 27. There was no significant different between these two methods on chromatic parameters.

     

/

返回文章
返回