陈娟, 周媛. 基于层次分析法的西南民族大学航空港校区景观综合评价[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2016, 36(6): 101-105. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2016.06.016
引用本文: 陈娟, 周媛. 基于层次分析法的西南民族大学航空港校区景观综合评价[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2016, 36(6): 101-105. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2016.06.016
Chen Juan, Zhou Yuan. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the University Landscape Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2016, 36(6): 101-105. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2016.06.016
Citation: Chen Juan, Zhou Yuan. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the University Landscape Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2016, 36(6): 101-105. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2016.06.016

基于层次分析法的西南民族大学航空港校区景观综合评价

A Comprehensive Evaluation of the University Landscape Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

  • 摘要: 以西南民族大学航空港校区景观为研究对象,在问卷调查和咨询专家的基础上,采用层次分析法构建了校园总体景观、建筑景观、绿化植物景观、水体景观、小品及公共设施景观5个一级因子和19个二级因子组成的校园景观评价模型,利用该模型对校区景观进行了综合评价。结果表明:西南民族大学航空港校区校园景观综合评价得分为321,评价等级为Ⅲ级,属于中等水平。各分项评价指标表现出不均衡性,绿化植物景观 (361)、校园总体景观 (330)、校园建筑景观 (314) 3项指标得分较高,尤其在植物四季景观多样性、校园景观优美度方面表现突出,分别为376和362,达到Ⅱ级标准,其中北区映月潭片区、南大门东西两侧片区深受师生喜爱;水体景观和小品景观于与公共设施两项指标得分较低,分别为280和274。评价结果符合校园实际,找出了校园景观存在人文景观要素缺乏、水体景观不完善、公共设施设置不合理等方面的问题,对校园景观的改进和提升具有一定的参考意义。

     

    Abstract: Based on the questionnaire and expert consultation, the landscape of airport campus of southwest university for nationalities were comprehensive evaluated by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP), which constructed the campus landscape evaluation model with 5 primary factors and 19 secondary factors, including overall landscape, architectural landscape, plant landscape, water landscape, sketch and public facilities landscape. The evaluation results showed that the score of the campus landscape assessment was 321, just on the Ⅲ grade level. The evaluation indicators of each item lacked of uniformity, 3 indicators scores were relatively high, including overall landscape (330), architectural landscape (314), plant landscape (361), especially made an outstanding performance in the two aspects of seasonal plant landscape diversity and graceful degree, scores were 376 and 362, reached Ⅱ grade level, The Yingyuetan region in north area and the east and west sides of south gat were the favorite landscape by the majority of teachers and students. The scores of water landscape, sketch and public facilities landscape were relatively low, 280 and 274 , respectively. The evaluation results conformed to actual situation of campus, some problem was found out in the campus landscape, such as lack of the humanities landscape elements, water landscape was not perfect and the public facilities was unreasonable either. It also showed that the results provided guidance to improve and upgrade the campus landscape.

     

/

返回文章
返回