黄柳菁, 林欣, 刘兴诏, 庄长伟, 肖荣波. 广东不同林龄乔木生物量及物种多样性与叶面积指数的关系[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2017, 37(6): 91-98. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2017.06.015
引用本文: 黄柳菁, 林欣, 刘兴诏, 庄长伟, 肖荣波. 广东不同林龄乔木生物量及物种多样性与叶面积指数的关系[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2017, 37(6): 91-98. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2017.06.015
Liujing Huang, Xin Lin, Xingzhao Liu, Changwe Zhuang, Rongbo Xiao. The Relation Among Biomass, Biodiversity and LAI of Trees at Different Stand Ages in Guangdong Province[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2017, 37(6): 91-98. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2017.06.015
Citation: Liujing Huang, Xin Lin, Xingzhao Liu, Changwe Zhuang, Rongbo Xiao. The Relation Among Biomass, Biodiversity and LAI of Trees at Different Stand Ages in Guangdong Province[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2017, 37(6): 91-98. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2017.06.015

广东不同林龄乔木生物量及物种多样性与叶面积指数的关系

The Relation Among Biomass, Biodiversity and LAI of Trees at Different Stand Ages in Guangdong Province

  • 摘要: 以广东的4个自然保护区和2个生态功能区的5种林龄的林分为研究对象,用样地调查法、生物量实测方法结合植物冠层分析仪对各样方的总生物量、乔木层的生物量、多样性指数和叶面积指数进行测定,分析其分布特征及相关关系。结果表明:总生物量为乔木层>灌木层>草木层,其中乔木层成熟林的生物量显著高于其他龄组,生物量关系为成熟林>近熟林>中龄林>过熟林>幼龄林,呈单峰型变化,在成熟林阶段达到峰值。乔木层LAI值在0.77~4.19;乔木层随着林龄的变化,LAI差异依次为中龄林>成熟林>近熟林>过熟林>幼龄林,呈倒“U”型变化;乔木层LAI与乔木层生物量存在正相关关系,相关显著;中龄林的乔木层LAI显著高于幼龄林和过熟林,中龄林、近熟林和成熟林的乔木层LAI差异不明显。不同林龄乔木层Shannon-Winner指数为近熟林>中龄林>过熟林>成熟林>幼龄林,总体趋势呈“S”型变化;不同林龄乔木层Pielou均匀度指数为成熟林>近熟林>中龄林>过熟林>幼龄林,总体趋势呈单峰型变化,峰值在成熟林阶段;乔木层Shannon-Winner指数、乔木层Pielou均匀度指数均与乔木层生物量呈线性显著正相关。因此,不同林龄下乔木层生物量、乔木层物种多样性指数和乔木层叶面积指数均存在差异;乔木层多样性指数与乔木层生物量存在正相关关系;乔木层叶面积指数与乔木层生物量存在正相关关系。

     

    Abstract: Forests under five different stand ages in four nature reserves and two eco-functional regions in Guangdong province were chosen as research objects. Total biomass, biomass of tree, biodiversity of tree and LAI were measured by field investigation. Its distribution characteristics and correlation were analyzed. The results showed that: The order of total biomass was: tree layer > shrub layer > herb layer, and the tree layer biomass of mature forest was significantly higher than others. The order of tree layer biomass was: mature forest > near mature forest > middle age forest > over mature forest > young forest, which showed a unimodal variation and reached a peak at mature forest stage. The tree layer LAI in the range of 0.77-4.19. The order of tree layer LAI was: middle age forest > mature forest > near mature forest > over mature forest > young forest, which showed an inverted "U" type change. There was a positive and significantly correlation between LAI and biomass in tree layer. LAI of middle age forest was significantly higher than that of young forest and mature forest. The differences of tree layer LAI between middle age forest, near mature forest and mature forest were not obvious. The order of Shannon-Winner index was: near mature forest > middle age forest > over mature forest > mature forest > young forest, which showed a "S" type change. The order of Pielou evenness index was: mature forest > near mature forest > middle age forest > over mature forest > the young forest, which showed a unimodal curve, and the peak in the mature forest stage. ShannonWinner index, Pielou evenness index of tree layer were positively related to tree layer biomass. Therefore, there were differences between biomass, species diversity index and leaf area index of tree layer in different age stands; there was a positive correlation between the biomass and species diversity index of tree layer; there was a positive correlation between leaf area index and biomass of tree layer.

     

/

返回文章
返回