郑雅兰, 王雷光, 陆翔. 高分二号全色-多光谱影像融合方法对比研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2018, 38(2): 103-110. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2018.02.016
引用本文: 郑雅兰, 王雷光, 陆翔. 高分二号全色-多光谱影像融合方法对比研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2018, 38(2): 103-110. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2018.02.016
Yalan Zheng, Leiguang Wang, Xiang Lu. Comparison of Image Fusion Methods for Gaofen-2 Panchromatic-Multispectral[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2018, 38(2): 103-110. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2018.02.016
Citation: Yalan Zheng, Leiguang Wang, Xiang Lu. Comparison of Image Fusion Methods for Gaofen-2 Panchromatic-Multispectral[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2018, 38(2): 103-110. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2018.02.016

高分二号全色-多光谱影像融合方法对比研究

Comparison of Image Fusion Methods for Gaofen-2 Panchromatic-Multispectral

  • 摘要: 基于高分二号卫星影像,选取GS变换、自适应GS变换、主成分分析、NND融合算法、UNB融合算法、SRM算法6种主流的融合方法进行融合试验,采用目视判读和定量评价的方法对融合结果进行直接评价,通过分类精度对融合结果进行间接评价,探究适用于高分二号卫星影像的融合方法。结果表明:研究区覆盖的地物类型不同,各融合方法的效果也不同。对于水体和绿色植被区域,GSA、GS和PCA方法的光谱保真性和细节增强能力较好,这3种方法适用于目视解译;从地物分类的角度来说,SRM方法的分类精度最高,适合用于地物分类方面的应用;UNB融合方法效果适中,可用作高分二号卫星影像融合的替补方法;而NND方法会出现轻微光谱失真现象,且其分类精度偏低,在实际应用中则不建议采用。

     

    Abstract: To explore the fusion method suitable for GaoFen-2 satellite images, the efficiency of six state-of-the-art fusion methods, including Gram-Schmidt Transformation (GS), Adaptive GS Transform (GSA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Nearest-neighbor Diffusion-based Pan-Sharpening (NND), University of New Brunswick (UNB) method, and Subtractive Resolution Merge (SRM) method were compared. Meanwhile, a combination of direct and indirect evaluation methods including visual interpretation and quantitative index and classification accuracy were used to evaluate the fusion effects. The results showed that the types of ground cover in the study area were different, and the effects of different fusion methods were different. For instance, the GSA, GS and PCA methods performed well in spatial detail enhancement and spectral preserving, they were suitable for visual interpretation. From the classification point of view, SRM method was best for the application. UNB method had moderate effect in fusion, it can be an alternate method for fusing Gaofen-2 images. And NND method appeared a slight spectral distortion and had lower classification accuracy, so it was not recommended in the practical application.

     

/

返回文章
返回