段丽华, 甘云浩, 张文东, 罗云生, 钟华, 岳金龙, 赵苗. 林下大球盖菇的种植试验[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2018, 38(4): 206-209. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2018.04.032
引用本文: 段丽华, 甘云浩, 张文东, 罗云生, 钟华, 岳金龙, 赵苗. 林下大球盖菇的种植试验[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2018, 38(4): 206-209. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2018.04.032
Lihua Duan, Yunhao Gan, Wendong Zhang, Yunsheng Luo, Hua Zhong, Jinlong Yue, Miao Zhao. Planting Trials of Undergrowth Stropharia rugosoannulata[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2018, 38(4): 206-209. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2018.04.032
Citation: Lihua Duan, Yunhao Gan, Wendong Zhang, Yunsheng Luo, Hua Zhong, Jinlong Yue, Miao Zhao. Planting Trials of Undergrowth Stropharia rugosoannulata[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2018, 38(4): 206-209. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2018.04.032

林下大球盖菇的种植试验

Planting Trials of Undergrowth Stropharia rugosoannulata

  • 摘要: 在昆明4个县、区进行不同季节、不同树种、不同郁闭度的林下大球盖菇种植试验,通过对其产量及产值进行调查,分析不同模式对大球盖菇产量的影响。结果表明:林下种植大球盖菇夏秋季的产量高于冬春季,提高了13.22%。大球盖菇产量与郁闭度差异明显,郁闭度为0.3~0.4时产量较高;其中郁闭度为0.3时产量最高,每平方米产量达3.93 kg;郁闭度为0.8时的产量最低,仅有1.55 kg/m2。相同条件下油橄榄林下种植大球盖菇的产量较高,平均达2.80 kg/m2,但产量与树种配置差异不明显。

     

    Abstract: In the 4 counties and districts of Kunming, planting trials of undergrowth Stropharia rugosoannulata under different seasons, different tree species, and different degrees of canopy closure were conducted. Through the investigation of its output and output value, the impact of different models on the yield of S.rugosoannulata was analyzed. The results showed that the yield of S.rugosoannulata planted under the forest was higher in summer and autumn than in winter and spring, which increased by 13.22%. There was obviously difference in yield and canopy closure of S.rugosoannulata, with a high yield of 0.3-0.4 canopy closure. The highest yield was 0.3 at canopy closure, with a yield of 3.93 kg/m2; the lowest yield at a canopy density of 0.8 was only 1.55 kg/m2. Under the same conditions, the yield of S.rugosoannulata planted under Olea europaea was relatively high, with an average of 2.80 kg/m2, but the yield and tree species allocation were not obviously different.

     

/

返回文章
返回