熊源, 徐伟恒, 黄邵东, 等. 融合可见光无人机与哨兵2A影像的森林火灾迹地精细化提取[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 41(4): 103–110 . DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202009008
引用本文: 熊源, 徐伟恒, 黄邵东, 等. 融合可见光无人机与哨兵2A影像的森林火灾迹地精细化提取[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 41(4): 103–110 . DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202009008
Xiong Yuan, Xu Weiheng, Huang Shaodong, Liu Minglu, Lei Jianyin, Wu Chao, Xu Haifeng, Wang Qiuhua. Fine Extraction of Forest Burned Area by Using Fusion Visible Light UAV Image with Sentinel−2A image[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2021, 41(4): 103-110. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202009008
Citation: Xiong Yuan, Xu Weiheng, Huang Shaodong, Liu Minglu, Lei Jianyin, Wu Chao, Xu Haifeng, Wang Qiuhua. Fine Extraction of Forest Burned Area by Using Fusion Visible Light UAV Image with Sentinel−2A image[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2021, 41(4): 103-110. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202009008

融合可见光无人机与哨兵2A影像的森林火灾迹地精细化提取

Fine Extraction of Forest Burned Area by Using Fusion Visible Light UAV Image with Sentinel−2A image

  • 摘要: 以2020年4月昆明市宜良县马街镇兴隆村森林火灾为研究对象,基于无人机的R、G、B 3个波段与哨兵2A多光谱影像,分别采用格莱姆−施密特与主成分光谱锐化融合方法进行影像融合,应用6种定量评价指标分别对融合结果进行评估。基于融合影像采用随机森林算法实现对火场边界内的森林火灾迹地的提取,并与Sentinel−2A影像提取森林火灾迹地的精度进行比较;将2种影像提取的过火面积与鉴定人员通过实地调研、GPS坐标打点,并结合UAV影像手动矢量化森林火灾迹地面积进行对比分析。结果表明:UAV与Sentinel−2A融合影像与仅利用Sentinel−2A多光谱影像对森林火灾迹地提取的生产者精度分别为96.14%、95.18%,使用者精度分别为97.79%、96.57%,Kappa系数分别为0.83、0.76;融合影像与Sentinel−2A影像提取过火面积与统计面积相对误差分别为−3.5%、−6.2%。因此,利用可见光UAV与Sentinel−2A影像采用GS融合方法,基于RF算法可高精度、精细化提取森林火灾迹地,且边界细节效果刻画更加明显。本研究方法可大大提高林火司法鉴定效率,减少外业工作量及降低成本,使得矢量化更加精准,增加司法鉴定结果的科学性和客观性。

     

    Abstract: We selected a forest fire which occurred in Xinglong Village, Majie Town, Yiliang County, Kunming City in April 2020 as our research case. First, we fused visible light image(R, G, B) derived from unmanned aerial vehicle(UAV) and Sentinel−2A multi-spectral imagery by using Gram−Schmidt(GS) and PC Spectral Sharping(PCSS) algorithms respectively. Second, 6 quantitative evaluation indicators were selected to evaluate the quality of the fusion results. Finally, fusion image was used to extract the forest burned area within the burned boundary based on Random Forest(RF) algorithm, then we compared the accuracies of extracting forest burned area with Sentinel−2A image only. The burned areas extracted from the 2 images were compared and analyzed with the appraisal personnel through field investigation, GPS coordinates and manual vectorization of forest burned area based on UAV images. The findings indicated that the forest burned area extraction accuracies of UAV and Sentinel−2A fusion image and Sentinel−2A image only were: producer's accuracy(96.14%, 95.18%), user's accuracy(97.79%, 96.57%), and Kappa coefficient(0.83, 0.76), respectively. Compared with the forest burned area derived from artificial map which combined field investigation with vectorization by appraises, the relative errors were −3.5% for fusion image and −6.2% Sentinel−2A image only. The results show that the fusion image of UAV and Sentinel−2A image for forest burned area extraction by RF has a higher accuracy than that of Sentinel−2A image only, and the details of the boundary between the burned area and the unburned area are more obvious. Our method can greatly improve the efficiency of judicial appraisal of the forest fire and get an accurate burned area, especially, increase the scientificity and objective of the judicial appraisal of the forest fire.

     

/

返回文章
返回