云南怒江流域森林地上生物量光学遥感估测及饱和点分析

Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation and Saturation Point Analysis Using Optical Remote Sensing in Nujiang River Basin of Yunnan Province

  • 摘要: 以云南省怒江流域为研究对象,基于2016年森林资源二类调查数据和同时期的Landsat 8 OLI遥感数据,提取小班遥感变量的均值统计值,选择蓄积量–生物量转换模型计算研究区9类优势树种或树种组的小班单位面积森林地上生物量,采用半变异函数的球状模型计算9类优势树种或树种组的光学遥感估测的光饱和值,应用逐步回归模型估测和BP神经网络模型对不同优势树种或树种组的森林地上森林生物量进行估测。结果表明:不同优势树种或树种组森林的森林地上生物量光学遥感估测的光饱和值分别为桦木林139 t/hm2、桤木林181 t/hm2、桉树林70 t/hm2、云南松林182 t/hm2、云冷杉林197 t/hm2、乔木经济林161 t/hm2、其他针叶林182 t/hm2、其他阔叶林147 t/hm2、常绿栎类林141 t/hm2;BP神经网络模型的拟合精度以及检验指标均明显优于多元逐步线性回归模型,其中各树种或树种组的BP神经网络模型的R2比多元逐步线性回归模型的R2高出0.1~0.2;逐步回归模型中其他阔叶林的R2最高,达到0.744;BP神经网络模型中其他阔叶林的R2最高,达0.815,且乔木经济林、常绿栎类林和桤木林的R2均在0.6以上;分段残差分析表明2个模型均存在低值高估和高值低估的情况,尤其在生物量小于150 t/hm2时,BP神经网络模型的估测精度较逐步线性回归有明显提高。

     

    Abstract: The Nujiang River Basin in Yunnan Province was taken as the research object, the second class forest resources survey data in 2016 and Landsat 8 OLI remote sensing data in the same period were selected as the data source. By extracting the statistical value of the mean value of remote sensing variables in the small class forest, the aboveground biomass per unit area of small class forest of 9 dominant tree species or tree species groups in the study area was calculated by volume-biomass conversion model. The spherical model of semivariogram was used to calculate the light saturation values of 9 dominant tree species or groups of tree species. The aboveground forest biomass of different dominant tree species or tree groups was estimated by the stepwise regression model and BP neural network model. The results show that the light saturation values of forest in different dominant species or groups of tree species are birch forest 139 t/hm2, logwood forest 181 t/hm2, eucalyptus forest 70 t/hm2, Yunnan pine forest 182 t/hm2, spruce fir forest 197 t/hm2, arbor economic forest 161 t/hm2, other coniferous forest 182 t/hm2, other broad-leaved forest 147 t/hm2, evergreen oak forest 141 t/hm2; the fitting accuracy and test index of the BP neural network model are obviously better than the multivariate stepwise linear regression model, the R2 of BP neural network model of each tree species or tree group is 0.1–0.2 higher than that of multivariate stepwise linear regression model; among the stepwise regression models, other broad-leaved forests have the highest R2 up to 0.744; other broad-leaved forests have the highest R2 in BP neural network models, up to 0.815, and the R2 of tree economic forest, evergreen oak forest and log forest are above 0.6; segmental residual analysis shows that both models have low value overestimation and high value underestimation, especially when the biomass is less than 150 t/hm2, BP the estimation accuracy of neural network model is obviously improved compared with stepwise linear regression.

     

/

返回文章
返回