婷婷, 吴荣良, 宋思宁, 郭闽, 郑郁善. 基于GIS的三明市城市绿地应急避难能力分析[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2013, 33(1): 55-59. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2013.01.010
引用本文: 婷婷, 吴荣良, 宋思宁, 郭闽, 郑郁善. 基于GIS的三明市城市绿地应急避难能力分析[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2013, 33(1): 55-59. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2013.01.010
HONG Ting-ting1, WU Rong-liang2, SONG Si-ning1, GUO Min1, ZHENG Yu-shan1. GIS Based Analysis on Emergency Shelters Capacity of Urban Greenspaces in Sanming City[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2013, 33(1): 55-59. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2013.01.010
Citation: HONG Ting-ting1, WU Rong-liang2, SONG Si-ning1, GUO Min1, ZHENG Yu-shan1. GIS Based Analysis on Emergency Shelters Capacity of Urban Greenspaces in Sanming City[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2013, 33(1): 55-59. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2013.01.010

基于GIS的三明市城市绿地应急避难能力分析

GIS Based Analysis on Emergency Shelters Capacity of Urban Greenspaces in Sanming City

  • 摘要: 用ARCGIS9.3空间数据管理和空间数据分析工具,对三明市建成区绿地应急避难场所的避难能力进行分析。结果表明:三明市106块绿地中,仅47块处于城市安全区范围内,总面积为12632hm2;建成区的有效避难面积共计84.65hm2,城市人均有效避难面积为2.72m2,但5个组团叠加相应的人口数量后,人均有效避难绿地的比率为1∶2∶2∶8∶5;建成区内,以紧急避难场所的服务半径500m提取的缓冲区所覆盖的居民区面积为2311hm2;避难场所空间分布上较不均匀,局部区域低于平均值高达50%以上;通过对灾后3、5、10min逃生距离内的绿地分布分析,仍有54%的人口未处于避难场所的覆盖范围内,各组团间可达性较弱。

     

    Abstract: The sheltering capacity of the greenspace refuge system in the builtup urban area of Sanming City was analyzed by means of applying ARCGIS spatial data management and spatial data analysis tool interfaces. The results showed that only 47 pieces of greenspace out of the total 106 were located within the safe urban space, whose total area was 126.32hm2. The effective refuge area in built-up area of Sanming City was 84.65hm2 in total, and the per capita index was 2.72m2. When the people of the five population groups of Sanming City were superimposed, the synergetic rate per capita of the five population groups was 1∶2∶2∶8∶5. Inside the builtup area, the residential area covered by the buffer zone that was extracted from the emergency shelters by 500m as service radius was 2311hm2 The refuge shelters were unevenly distributed, the unit area index in some sections in the builtup area was 50% lower than the average. The analysis on the refuge shelter greenspce distribution by 3min, 5min, and 10min escape distance after disaster occurrence showed that there was still 5.4% of the population would not be covered by the refuge shelter system and the accessibility among the population groups was comparatively weak.

     

/

返回文章
返回