崔新婕, 邱坚, 杨燕. 山楠普文楠木材解剖构造对比分析[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2015, 35(3): 107-110. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2015.03.019
引用本文: 崔新婕, 邱坚, 杨燕. 山楠普文楠木材解剖构造对比分析[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2015, 35(3): 107-110. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2015.03.019
CUI Xin-jie1, 2, QIU Jian1. Wood Anatomical Structure Analysis of Phoebe chinensis and Phoebe puwenensis[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2015, 35(3): 107-110. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2015.03.019
Citation: CUI Xin-jie1, 2, QIU Jian1. Wood Anatomical Structure Analysis of Phoebe chinensis and Phoebe puwenensis[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2015, 35(3): 107-110. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2015.03.019

山楠普文楠木材解剖构造对比分析

Wood Anatomical Structure Analysis of Phoebe chinensis and Phoebe puwenensis

  • 摘要: 利用木材解剖学的研究方法分析山楠、普文楠2种木材宏观和微观构造特征,并将其进行对比。结果表明:2种木材均具有楠属木材的基础构造特征,但山楠在材色及气味等方面与普文楠相差较大。微观构造上,山楠较普文楠横切面上管孔团出现的频率更高;普文楠微观结构上并未见油细胞;山楠仅具单穿孔,普文楠除单穿孔外兼具梯状穿孔。

     

    Abstract: To understand the wood macroscopic and microcosmic structure of Phoebe chinensis and Phoebe puwenensis, comparison between those two timbers were studied. Results showed that, both of them had the basic structural characteristics of Phoebe. However, macrostructure of Phoebe chinensis had significant differences on color and aroma with Phoebe puwenensis. Phoebe chinensis had more pore cluster than Phoebe puwenensis. Phoebe puwenensis had no oil cell on microstructure. Phoebe chinensis only had single perforation while Phoebe puwenensis had both single perforation and scalariform perforation.

     

/

返回文章
返回